Skip to content
etf.net

TCAN vs XRPZ

21Shares Canton Network ETF

TCANDNasdaq

Franklin XRP ETF

XRPZANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XRPZ −0.31pt a year

TCAN0.50%XRPZ0.19%

Avg volume · 30D

XRPZ 40.8×the volume

TCAN12.8KXRPZ523K

TCAN vs XRPZ Performance

Aug 3, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026

−15.2%TCAN+18.5%XRPZ

Aug 3, 2026 to Nov 3, 2026. TCAN −15.2%. XRPZ +18.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
TCAN 0.50%
XRPZ 0.19%, better
Fund size
TCAN $8M
XRPZ $387M
Holdings
TCAN 3
XRPZ 1
Avg volume (30D)
TCAN 12.8K sh
XRPZ 523K sh, better
NAV per share
TCAN $15.77
XRPZ $13.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

TCAN: Cost 28, Risk 38, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings 68, Durability 29. XRPZ: Cost 100, Risk 44, Mission 99, Tradability 82, Holdings not scored, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for TCAN, XRPZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarTCANXRPZ
Cost30% weightD28A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA99
Risk15% weightD38C44Higher
Tradability15% weightD26A82Higher
Holdings10% weightB68Not scored
Durability5% weightD29A84Higher

Rank among Crypto Spot funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. TCAN and XRPZ are both graded against the same 25 Crypto Spot funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Crypto Spot⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

XRPZ ranks 1st and TCAN 24th of 25 funds in the Crypto Spot Category.

  1. Rank 1AXRPZFranklin XRP ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AHYPGGrayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 23DSUISCanary Staked SUI ETFScore 32
  4. Rank 24DTCAN21Shares Canton Network ETFScore 29
  5. Rank 25DTKNS21Shares Active Crypto ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

TCAND21Shares Canton Network ETF

XRPZAFranklin XRP ETF

In short

TCAN The first US ETF built around Canton Coin, the utility token of a privacy-focused blockchain designed for institutional finance. One token, one wrapper, bought like any other stock.

XRPZ No data

Stated mandate

TCAN The Fund seeks returns, before fees and expenses, that correspond to Canton Coin’s price performance. It primarily invests in CC and other instruments designed to provide exposure to or returns consistent with CC.

XRPZ No data

Why people hold it

  • TCAN Launched 2026 as the first US ETF offering direct exposure to Canton Coin, so no crypto exchange account or private keys to manage.globenewswire.com
  • Plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in CC and CC-linked instruments, tracking the coin's price before fees. No basket, no index detours.21shares.com
  • Canton's validator and governance ranks include Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank, though their involvement is not an endorsement of the coin or the fund.globenewswire.com
  • Runs as a 1940 Act fund, with BitGo Bank & Trust and U.S. Bank named as fund custodians rather than the issuer holding coins itself.21shares.com

XRPZ No data

Worth knowing

  • TCAN Costs 0.50% a year against a 0.35% median for spot-crypto funds. Cheaper names sit in the group (XRPZ, XRP), but none of them hold Canton Coin.
  • Small and thinly traded, so spreads can be wide and shares can trade at a premium or discount to NAV.21shares.com
  • Single-token exposure with a short operating history and no distributions; the coin's price does all the work.21shares.com

XRPZ No data

Full TCAN profile⁠

Full XRPZ profile⁠

TCAN vs XRPZ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

TCAN vs XRPZ Cost

Overpaying TCAN vs XRPZ

$6,027

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • TCAN 0.50%

    $9,979

  • XRPZ 0.19%

    $3,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • TCAN 0.50%
  • XRPZ 0.19%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530TCAN $9,979XRPZ $3,952

Year by year

YearTCANXRPZOverpaying
10$900$347$553
20$3,460$1,351$2,109
30$9,979$3,952$6,027

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%TCAN
  • 0.19%XRPZ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Crypto Spot funds
  • Median 0.35%

XRPZ cheapest of 25 funds

TCAN 17th cheapest of 25 funds

TCAN vs XRPZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 3, 2026
Payout (12M)
TCAN None
XRPZ None

Distribution history

TCANAll TCAN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XRPZAll XRPZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TCAN vs XRPZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
TCAN 5.11XRPZ 1.09

TCAN and XRPZ in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • TCANDvsHYPGA

    21Shares Canton Network ETF · Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XRPZAvsHYPGA

    Franklin XRP ETF · Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TCANDvsTHYPA

    21Shares Canton Network ETF · 21Shares Hyperliquid ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XRPZAvsTHYPA

    Franklin XRP ETF · 21Shares Hyperliquid ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TCANDvsXRPA

    21Shares Canton Network ETF · Bitwise XRP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.34%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XRPZAvsXRPA

    Franklin XRP ETF · Bitwise XRP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.34%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.