TSLR ranks 3rd and TESC 8th of 10 funds in the 2x Long Tesla (TSLA) Category.
TESC vs TSLR
0.0%by weight
TESC −0.78pt a year
0.20%0.98%
TSLR 2299.4×the volume
5741.32M
TESC vs TSLR Performance
+53.3%+54.6%
- TESC 0.20%, better
- TSLR 0.98%
- TESC $0
- TSLR $82M
- TESC
- TSLR −44.0%
- TESC 1
- TSLR 2
- TESC 574 sh
- TSLR 1.32M sh, better
- TESC $24.82
- TSLR $19.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TESC | TSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B58Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | F13 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F15 | B63Higher |
Rank among 2x Long Tesla (TSLA) funds
Same Category. TESC and TSLR are both graded against the same 10 2x Long Tesla (TSLA) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TESCC
TSLRB
In short
TSLR Tesla, doubled, for a single day. TSLR aims for 2x TSLA's daily move through swaps, resets every night, and charges 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
Stated mandate
TSLR The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Tesla Inc.'s common stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TESC vs TSLR Holdings
How TESC and TSLR differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of TESC and 0.0% of TSLR.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TESC.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in TESCMore in TSLR | TESC | TSLR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- TESC199.0%
- TSLR100.0%
- TESC0
- TSLR1
Asset class
- TESC
- Equity
- TSLR
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in TESC0
- In both0
- Only in TSLR1
Only in TESC
0 securities, 0.0% of TESC by weight
Only in TSLR
1 security, 66.6% of TSLR by weight
- Tsla66.63%
Weight gaps
TESC and TSLR share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TESC vs TSLR Cost
Overpaying TSLR vs TESC
$14,207
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TESC 0.20%
$4,155
TSLR 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TESC | TSLR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,729 | $1,364 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $6,504 | $5,083 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $18,362 | $14,207 |
- 0.20%TESC, cheaper
- 0.98%TSLR
- Middle half of 2x Long Tesla (TSLA) funds
- Median 0.97%
TESC cheapest of 10 funds
TSLR 6th cheapest of 10 funds
TESC vs TSLR Dividends
- TESC None
- TSLR None
Distribution history
TESC vs TSLR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TESC TSLR 104.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- TESC TSLR 0.46
- Worst fall
- TESC TSLR −82.8%
- Market sensitivity
- TESC 0.00TSLR 3.59
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.83%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.83%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 1.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 1.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.