Skip to content
etf.net

TGRZ vs XAIX

China AI Tigers LLM ETF

TGRZ—Nasdaq

Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF

XAIXANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XAIX −0.51pt a year

TGRZ0.86%XAIX0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

XAIX 1.1×the volume

TGRZ18KXAIX20.3K

TGRZ vs XAIX Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−26.5%TGRZ−7.8%XAIX

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. TGRZ −26.5%. XAIX −7.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
TGRZ 0.86%
XAIX 0.35%, better
Fund size
TGRZ $1M
XAIX $150M
1Y total return
TGRZ No data
XAIX +23.2%
Yield (12M)
TGRZ No data
XAIX 0.41%
Holdings
TGRZ 5
XAIX 102
Avg volume (30D)
TGRZ 18K sh
XAIX 20.3K sh, better
NAV per share
TGRZ $10.96
XAIX $54.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —TGRZNot yet graded
XAIX: Cost 97, Risk 84, Mission 70, Tradability 57, Holdings 63, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for TGRZ, XAIX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarTGRZXAIX
Cost30% weightNot scoredA97
Mission25% weightNot scoredA70
Risk15% weightNot scoredA84
Tradability15% weightNot scoredB57
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB63
Durability5% weightNot scoredB64

Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds

How we build Categories ›

Artificial Intelligence⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XAIX ranks 1st of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.

  1. Rank 1AQTUMDefiance Quantum ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 1AXAIXXtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 3AARTYiShares Future AI & Tech ETFScore 72
  4. TGRZNot yet graded

TGRZ vs XAIX Holdings

How TGRZ and XAIX differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of TGRZ and 0.0% of XAIX.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile84.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for TGRZ.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in TGRZ and XAIX, widest gap first
CountryMore in TGRZMore in XAIX
United StatesTGRZ +15.6 points
South KoreaXAIX +7.3 points
ChinaXAIX +3.9 points
GermanyXAIX +2.1 points
TaiwanXAIX +1.1 points
JapanXAIX +0.8 points
Other countries (3)XAIX +0.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • TGRZ153.1%
  • XAIX45.7%

Securities held

  • TGRZ2
  • XAIX101

Asset class

TGRZ
Equity
XAIX
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in TGRZ2
  • In both0
  • Only in XAIX101

Only in TGRZ

2 securities, 53.0% of TGRZ by weight

  • First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/203137.50%
  • United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202615.48%

Only in XAIX

101 securities, 99.6% of XAIX by weight

  • Microsoft Corp6.33%
  • Apple Inc5.38%
  • Meta Platform Inc Class A4.94%

Weight gaps

TGRZ and XAIX share no securities.

All TGRZ holdings⁠All 103 XAIX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

TGRZ vs XAIX Cost

Overpaying TGRZ vs XAIX

$9,242

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • TGRZ 0.86%

    $16,368

  • XAIX 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • TGRZ 0.86%
  • XAIX 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TGRZ $16,368XAIX $7,126

Year by year

YearTGRZXAIXOverpaying
10$1,525$634$891
20$5,768$2,454$3,314
30$16,368$7,126$9,242

Expense ratio

  • 0.86%TGRZ
  • 0.35%XAIX, cheaper
  • Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
  • Median 0.65%

XAIX cheapest of 30 funds

TGRZ 27th cheapest of 30 funds

TGRZ vs XAIX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
TGRZ No data
XAIX 0.41%
Payout (12M)
TGRZ None
XAIX $0.22
Last payment
TGRZ No data
XAIX $0.10
Ex-dividend
TGRZ No data
XAIX Jun 18, 2026
Paid on
TGRZ No data
XAIX Jun 26, 2026
Frequency
TGRZ No data
XAIX Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

TGRZAll TGRZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XAIXTwice a year · 4 paymentsAll XAIX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2024 $0.03; Jun 20, 2025 $0.11; Dec 19, 2025 $0.12; Jun 18, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD

TGRZ vs XAIX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
TGRZ No dataXAIX 26.1%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
TGRZ No dataXAIX 0.98since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
TGRZ No dataXAIX −24.0%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
TGRZ 0.00XAIX 1.75

TGRZ and XAIX in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • TGRZ—vsQTUMA

    China AI Tigers LLM ETF · Defiance Quantum ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XAIXAvsQTUMA

    Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF · Defiance Quantum ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TGRZ—vsARTYA

    China AI Tigers LLM ETF · iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XAIXAvsARTYA

    Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF · iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TGRZ—vsAIHYB

    China AI Tigers LLM ETF · Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XAIXAvsAIHYB

    Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF · Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.