Skip to content
etf.net

QTUM vs TGRZ

Defiance Quantum ETF

QTUMANasdaq

China AI Tigers LLM ETF

TGRZ—Nasdaq

Overlap

0.3%by weight

Expense ratio

QTUM −0.46pt a year

QTUM0.40%TGRZ0.86%

Avg volume · 30D

QTUM 20.1×the volume

QTUM362KTGRZ18K

QTUM vs TGRZ Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−11.7%QTUM−26.5%TGRZ

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. QTUM −11.7%. TGRZ −26.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
QTUM 0.40%, better
TGRZ 0.86%
Fund size
QTUM $5.06B
TGRZ $1M
1Y total return
QTUM +17.5%
TGRZ No data
Yield (12M)
QTUM 1.05%
TGRZ No data
Holdings
QTUM 89
TGRZ 5
Avg volume (30D)
QTUM 362K sh, better
TGRZ 18K sh
NAV per share
QTUM $134.11
TGRZ $10.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —TGRZNot yet graded
QTUM: Cost 86, Risk 70, Mission 74, Tradability 70, Holdings 91, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for QTUM, TGRZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQTUMTGRZ
Cost30% weightA86Not scored
Mission25% weightA74Not scored
Risk15% weightA70Not scored
Tradability15% weightA70Not scored
Holdings10% weightA91Not scored
Durability5% weightA79Not scored

Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds

How we build Categories ›

Artificial Intelligence⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

QTUM ranks 1st of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.

  1. Rank 1AQTUMDefiance Quantum ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 1AXAIXXtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETFScore 79
  3. TGRZNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QTUMADefiance Quantum ETF

TGRZ—China AI Tigers LLM ETF

In short

QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.

TGRZ No data

Stated mandate

QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.

TGRZ No data

Why people hold it

  • QTUM 0.40% a year against a 0.68% median for its AI-theme cohort, and it undercuts peers like WTAI (0.45%) and ALAI (0.55%).
  • Rules-based by design: it tracks the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index, so no manager is hand-picking which quantum story wins.
  • About 90 holdings across global markets, so the theme rides on a basket instead of two or three pure plays.
  • Size and liquidity back it up: a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the stronger implementations in its thematic peer group.

TGRZ No data

Worth knowing

  • QTUM Risk is the softest part of the profile. One narrow, early-stage theme in a single asset class means sharper swings than a broad-market fund.
  • The index covers machine learning as well as quantum, so part of the basket is familiar AI exposure rather than quantum specialists.
  • Distributions come quarterly, but a growth theme like this is not built around income.

TGRZ No data

Full QTUM profile⁠

Full TGRZ profile⁠

QTUM vs TGRZ Holdings

How QTUM and TGRZ differ

Overlap by weight

0.3%

Shared holdings make up 37.5% of TGRZ and 0.3% of QTUM.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both0.3%
  • Countryby domicile63.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for TGRZ.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in QTUM and TGRZ, widest gap first
CountryMore in QTUMMore in TGRZ
United StatesTGRZ +36.5 points
JapanQTUM +9.0 points
TaiwanQTUM +7.4 points
NetherlandsQTUM +4.8 points
SingaporeQTUM +2.8 points
ChinaQTUM +1.9 points
United KingdomQTUM +1.7 points
ItalyQTUM +1.6 points
Other countries (7)QTUM +7.2 points

Outside the US: QTUM 68% developed, 32% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QTUM18.3%
  • TGRZ153.1%

Securities held

  • QTUM86
  • TGRZ2

Asset class

QTUM
Equity
TGRZ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in QTUM85
  • In both1
  • Only in TGRZ1

Only in QTUM

85 securities, 99.6% of QTUM by weight

  • Global Unichip Corp2.44%
  • Elastic NV2.09%
  • Palantir Technologies Inc1.85%

Only in TGRZ

1 security, 15.5% of TGRZ by weight

  • United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202615.48%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in QTUM and TGRZ, widest gap first
HoldingMore in QTUMMore in TGRZ
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031TGRZ +37.17 points

All 89 QTUM holdings⁠All TGRZ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QTUM vs TGRZ Cost

Overpaying TGRZ vs QTUM

$8,278

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QTUM 0.40%

    $8,090

  • TGRZ 0.86%

    $16,368

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QTUM 0.40%
  • TGRZ 0.86%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TGRZ $16,368QTUM $8,090

Year by year

YearQTUMTGRZOverpaying
10$723$1,525$802
20$2,793$5,768$2,975
30$8,090$16,368$8,278

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
  • 0.86%TGRZ
  • Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
  • Median 0.65%

QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds

TGRZ 27th cheapest of 30 funds

QTUM vs TGRZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QTUM 1.05%
TGRZ No data
Payout (12M)
QTUM $1.40
TGRZ None
Last payment
QTUM $0.46
TGRZ No data
Ex-dividend
QTUM Sep 23, 2026
TGRZ No data
Paid on
QTUM Sep 24, 2026
TGRZ No data
Frequency
QTUM Quarterly
TGRZ No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

QTUMQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll QTUM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2018 $0.04; Mar 12, 2019 $0.02; Jun 24, 2019 $0.08; Sep 17, 2019 $0.04; Dec 26, 2019 $0.04; Mar 24, 2020 $0.03; Jun 23, 2020 $0.07; Sep 22, 2020 $0.06; Dec 29, 2020 $0.05; Mar 24, 2021 $0.03; Jun 23, 2021 $0.10; Sep 22, 2021 $0.08; Dec 29, 2021 $0.07; Mar 23, 2022 $0.08; Jun 22, 2022 $0.19; Sep 21, 2022 $0.23; Dec 28, 2022 $0.07; Mar 22, 2023 $0.08; Jun 21, 2023 $0.12; Sep 20, 2023 $0.15; Dec 27, 2023 $0.09; Mar 20, 2024 $0.10; Jun 26, 2024 $0.20; Sep 25, 2024 $0.12; Dec 27, 2024 $0.08; Mar 26, 2025 $0.16; Jun 25, 2025 $0.27; Sep 24, 2025 $0.24; Dec 29, 2025 $0.45; Mar 25, 2026 $0.22; Jun 24, 2026 $0.27; Sep 23, 2026 $0.46. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
TGRZAll TGRZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTUM vs TGRZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QTUM 28.6%TGRZ No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QTUM 1.30TGRZ No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QTUM −38.4%TGRZ No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QTUM 1.67TGRZ 0.00

QTUM and TGRZ in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • QTUMAvsXAIXA

    Defiance Quantum ETF · Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TGRZ—vsXAIXA

    China AI Tigers LLM ETF · Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTUMAvsARTYA

    Defiance Quantum ETF · iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TGRZ—vsARTYA

    China AI Tigers LLM ETF · iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTUMAvsAIHYB

    Defiance Quantum ETF · Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TGRZ—vsAIHYB

    China AI Tigers LLM ETF · Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.