USNG ranks 11th and TRUF 23rd of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.
TRUF vs USNG
TRUF −0.49pt a year
0.10%0.59%
USNG 13.4×the volume
3745.02K
TRUF vs USNG Performance
−0.4%+3.3%
- TRUF 0.10%, better
- USNG 0.59%
- TRUF $1M
- USNG $11M
- TRUF
- USNG +28.4%
- TRUF
- USNG 1.27%
- TRUF 79
- USNG 27
- TRUF 374 sh
- USNG 5.02K sh, better
- TRUF $29.47
- USNG $35.36
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TRUF | USNG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B65 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A92Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | C41 | B56Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | C46Higher |
| Durability | F17 | C40Higher |
Rank among US Active Sector funds
Same Category. TRUF and USNG are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TRUFC
USNGB
In short
TRUF Most active funds exist to beat a benchmark. TRUF is active so it can hug one: it holds US financials at true market weight, sidestepping the diversification caps that force many sector funds to shrink their largest names.
USNG Most energy funds hand you the whole barrel. USNG tracks one molecule: natural gas, from wellhead to pipeline to export dock, in a compact active portfolio of roughly 25 US-listed names picked on growth at a reasonable price.
Stated mandate
TRUF The Fund is an actively managed ETF seeking long-term capital appreciation through securities of financials-related companies or instruments providing exposure to such companies.
USNG USNG seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S.-listed equity securities of natural gas companies benefiting from the U.S. natural gas infrastructure ecosystem across upstream, midstream, and downstream segments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TRUF vs USNG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TRUF vs USNG Cost
Overpaying USNG vs TRUF
$9,529
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TRUF 0.10%
$2,106
USNG 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TRUF | USNG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $1,058 | $875 |
| 20 | $717 | $4,051 | $3,334 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $11,635 | $9,529 |
- 0.10%TRUF, cheaper
- 0.59%USNG
- Middle half of US Active Sector funds
- Median 0.61%
TRUF cheapest of 35 funds
USNG 12th cheapest of 35 funds
TRUF vs USNG Dividends
- TRUF
- USNG 1.27%
- TRUF
- USNG $0.45
- TRUF $0.10
- USNG $0.12
- TRUF Oct 1, 2026
- USNG Sep 29, 2026
- TRUF Oct 6, 2026
- USNG Sep 30, 2026
- TRUF Quarterly
- USNG Quarterly
Distribution history
TRUF vs USNG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TRUF USNG 15.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- TRUF USNG 1.41
- Worst fall
- TRUF USNG −11.9%
- Market sensitivity
- TRUF −1.04USNG 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.