Skip to content
etf.net

TMED vs USNG

T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

TMEDBNasdaq

Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF

USNGBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TMED −0.15pt a year

TMED0.44%USNG0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

TMED 1.5×the volume

TMED7.43KUSNG5.02K

TMED vs USNG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+20.6%TMED+28.4%USNG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. TMED +20.6%. USNG +28.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
TMED 0.44%, better
USNG 0.59%
Fund size
TMED $34M
USNG $11M
1Y total return
TMED +20.6%
USNG +28.4%, better
Yield (12M)
TMED No data
USNG 1.27%
Holdings
TMED 112
USNG 27
Avg volume (30D)
TMED 7.43K sh, better
USNG 5.02K sh
NAV per share
TMED $34.31
USNG $35.36
52W range

ETF.net Grade

TMED: Cost 82, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 91, Durability 35. USNG: Cost 65, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 46, Durability 40.
Pillar letters and Scores for TMED, USNG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarTMEDUSNG
Cost30% weightA82HigherB65
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB55HigherC51
Tradability15% weightB59HigherB56
Holdings10% weightA91HigherC46
Durability5% weightD35C40Higher

Rank among US Active Sector funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. TMED and USNG are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TMED ranks 2nd and USNG 11th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2BTMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4ATRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 10BPYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 11BUSNGAmplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETFScore 56
  7. Rank 12BDFNLDavis Select Financial ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

TMEDBT. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

USNGBAmplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF

In short

TMED No data

USNG Most energy funds hand you the whole barrel. USNG tracks one molecule: natural gas, from wellhead to pipeline to export dock, in a compact active portfolio of roughly 25 US-listed names picked on growth at a reasonable price.

Stated mandate

TMED No data

USNG USNG seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S.-listed equity securities of natural gas companies benefiting from the U.S. natural gas infrastructure ecosystem across upstream, midstream, and downstream segments.

Why people hold it

TMED No data

  • USNG One commodity, the full chain: upstream producers, midstream pipelines and downstream users, instead of a broad oil-and-gas basket.amplifyetfs.com
  • A 0.59% expense ratio, below the median for its actively managed US equity peer group.
  • Stock picking runs through an advertised GARP screen, pairing growth in the gas buildout with a valuation check rather than chasing either alone.amplifyetfs.com
  • Built as a standard 1940 Act fund that pays quarterly, so income arrives on a set cadence with 1099 tax reporting, not partnership K-1s.amplifyetfs.com

Worth knowing

TMED No data

  • USNG Roughly 25 holdings tied to one commodity chain. Gas prices, pipeline approvals and LNG policy move this portfolio hard in both directions.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads can be wide. Limit orders and market-hours trading matter more here than with a mega-cap index fund.
  • Launched in 2025, so the track record is short and our review places it in the lower half of its US active equity peer group.

Full TMED profile⁠

Full USNG profile⁠

TMED vs USNG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

TMED vs USNG Cost

Overpaying USNG vs TMED

$2,783

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • TMED 0.44%

    $8,852

  • USNG 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • TMED 0.44%
  • USNG 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530USNG $11,635TMED $8,852

Year by year

YearTMEDUSNGOverpaying
10$794$1,058$264
20$3,061$4,051$990
30$8,852$11,635$2,783

Expense ratio

  • 0.44%TMED, cheaper
  • 0.59%USNG
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TMED 7th cheapest of 35 funds

USNG 12th cheapest of 35 funds

TMED vs USNG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
TMED No data
USNG 1.27%
Payout (12M)
TMED No data
USNG $0.45
Last payment
TMED $0.16
USNG $0.12
Ex-dividend
TMED Dec 23, 2025
USNG Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
TMED Dec 26, 2025
USNG Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
TMED Irregular
USNG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

TMEDIrregular · 1 paymentAll TMED payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
USNGQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll USNG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Sep 29, 2025 $0.20; Dec 30, 2025 $0.11; Mar 30, 2026 $0.10; Jun 29, 2026 $0.12; Sep 29, 2026 $0.12. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

TMED vs USNG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
TMED 14.7%since Jul 2025USNG 15.9%since Jun 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
TMED 1.50since Jul 2025USNG 1.41since Jun 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
TMED −11.1%since Jun 2025USNG −11.9%since May 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
TMED 0.46USNG 0.40

Popular comparisons

  • TMEDBvsAVREA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • USNGBvsAVREA

    Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TMEDBvsPSRA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • USNGBvsPSRA

    Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TMEDBvsTRUTA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • USNGBvsTRUTA

    Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF · VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.