UNHG ranks 2nd and TSMX 25th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
TSMX vs UNHG
UNHG −0.22pt a year
0.99%0.77%
UNHG 1.2×the volume
626K726K
TSMX vs UNHG Performance
+42.1%+11.9%
- TSMX 0.99%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- TSMX $553M
- UNHG $63M
- TSMX +42.1%, better
- UNHG +11.9%
- TSMX 6.13%
- UNHG
- TSMX 9
- UNHG 5
- TSMX 626K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- TSMX $79.33
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TSMX | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A90 |
| Risk | A84Higher | A83 |
| Tradability | B65 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A86Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. TSMX and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TSMXB
UNHGA
In short
TSMX Double-speed Taiwan Semiconductor, one trading day at a time. TSMX aims to deliver 200% of the stock's daily move, resets every night, and charges a fraction of what the only other 2x TSM bull fund does.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
TSMX The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd common shares. It is designed for a single day and does not seek to provide that multiple over longer periods.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TSMX vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TSMX vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying TSMX vs UNHG
$3,696
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TSMX 0.99%
$18,525
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TSMX | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,371 | $375 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $5,205 | $1,360 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $14,829 | $3,696 |
- 0.99%TSMX
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
TSMX 169th cheapest of 315 funds
TSMX vs UNHG Dividends
- TSMX 6.13%
- UNHG
- TSMX $4.28
- UNHG
- TSMX $0.32
- UNHG $1.90
- TSMX Sep 22, 2026
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- TSMX Sep 29, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- TSMX Quarterly
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
TSMX vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TSMX 73.2%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- TSMX 0.98UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- TSMX −63.8%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- TSMX 3.06UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.