XHLF ranks 6th and ULST 40th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ULST vs XHLF
XHLF −0.17pt a year
0.20%0.03%
XHLF 3.9×the volume
77.5K299K
ULST +0.3pt
+4.7%+4.4%
ULST vs XHLF Performance
+3.4%+3.6%
- ULST 0.20%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- ULST $527M
- XHLF $2.04B
- ULST +3.4%
- XHLF +3.6%, better
- ULST 4.15%, better
- XHLF 3.68%
- ULST 276
- XHLF 29
- ULST 77.5K sh
- XHLF 299K sh, better
- ULST $40.23
- XHLF $50.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ULST | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C45Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | C43 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | B57Higher | D30 |
| Durability | A78Higher | B59 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ULST and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ULSTB
XHLFA
In short
ULST The active option in a category full of index trackers: State Street's managers hand-pick roughly 300 short, high-quality bonds to squeeze income out of cash-adjacent money, and pay it out monthly.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
ULST ULST seeks to maximize current income while preserving capital and maintaining daily liquidity through short-duration, high-quality investments. It is actively managed and invests in securities somewhat longer-term than traditional cash vehicles.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ULST vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ULST vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying ULST vs XHLF
$3,517
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ULST 0.20%
$4,155
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ULST | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $55 | $310 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $216 | $1,205 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $638 | $3,517 |
- 0.20%ULST
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
ULST 44th cheapest of 78 funds
ULST vs XHLF Dividends
- ULST 4.15%, better
- XHLF 3.68%
- ULST $1.67
- XHLF $1.85
- ULST $0.14
- XHLF $0.16
- ULST Nov 2, 2026
- XHLF Nov 2, 2026
- ULST Nov 5, 2026
- XHLF Nov 5, 2026
- ULST Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
ULST vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ULST 0.7%XHLF 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ULST 0.30, betterXHLF −0.50
- Worst fall
- ULST −1.1%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ULST 0.10XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.