VYM ranks 2nd and ULVM 32nd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ULVM vs VYM
VYM −0.16pt a year
0.20%0.04%
VYM 539.9×the volume
2.12K1.14M
VYM +0.5pt
+11.3%+11.8%
ULVM vs VYM Performance
+70.4%+74.3%
- ULVM 0.20%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- ULVM $267M
- VYM $95.8B
- ULVM +21.7%, better
- VYM +19.3%
- ULVM 1.79%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- ULVM 126
- VYM 601
- ULVM 2.12K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- ULVM $106.88
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ULVM | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A80Higher | A79 |
| Risk | A75 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | D32 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | B67Higher | C53 |
| Durability | C51 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ULVM and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ULVMB
VYMA
In short
ULVM Most factor funds make you pick a side: cheap stocks or winning stocks. ULVM buys the overlap, holding roughly 130 US names that screen well on both value and momentum, with weights tilted toward the calmer ones.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
ULVM The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the MSCI USA Select Value Momentum Blend Index.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ULVM vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ULVM vs VYM Cost
Overpaying ULVM vs VYM
$3,306
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ULVM 0.20%
$4,155
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ULVM | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $73 | $292 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $288 | $1,133 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $849 | $3,306 |
- 0.20%ULVM
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
ULVM 30th cheapest of 99 funds
ULVM vs VYM Dividends
- ULVM 1.79%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- ULVM $1.92
- VYM $3.68
- ULVM $0.21
- VYM $0.89
- ULVM Oct 8, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- ULVM Oct 9, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- ULVM Monthly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
ULVM vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ULVM
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ULVM 13.1%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ULVM 1.35VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- ULVM −19.8%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ULVM 0.87VYM 0.75
ULVM and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



