USCA ranks 2nd and UPGD 24th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
UPGD vs USCA
USCA −0.33pt a year
0.40%0.07%
USCA 27.7×the volume
3.54K97.9K
USCA +3.5pt
+17.0%+20.5%
UPGD vs USCA Performance
+14.2%+7.7%
- UPGD 0.40%
- USCA 0.07%, better
- UPGD $110M
- USCA $3.42B
- UPGD +14.2%, better
- USCA +7.7%
- UPGD 1.56%, better
- USCA 1.05%
- UPGD 53
- USCA 392
- UPGD 3.54K sh
- USCA 97.9K sh, better
- UPGD $82.58
- USCA $44.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | UPGD | USCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A91 | |
| Risk | C54 | C54 |
| Tradability | F13 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | B61Higher | D29 |
| Durability | C43 | C49Higher |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. UPGD and USCA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
UPGDD
USCAA
In short
UPGD Most equity funds screen for cheap or profitable. UPGD screens for improving: about 50 US large and mid caps whose analyst recommendations are trending up, run as a rules-based index at 0.40%.
USCA The largest US ETF debut on record when it launched in 2023, seeded by a Finnish pension fund. It owns roughly 400 US large- and mid-caps, keeping only the top half of each sector on MSCI's climate-transition scoring, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
UPGD The fund is tied to the Bloomberg ANR Improvers Index, which selects 50 companies from the Bloomberg US Large Mid Universe using analyst-recommendation improvement scores.
USCA The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Climate Action Index before fees and expenses through a passive indexing strategy. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies assessed as leading sector peers in climate-transition positioning and actions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
UPGD vs USCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
UPGD vs USCA Cost
Overpaying UPGD vs USCA
$6,610
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
UPGD 0.40%
$8,090
USCA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | UPGD | USCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $128 | $595 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $503 | $2,290 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $1,480 | $6,610 |
- 0.40%UPGD
- 0.07%USCA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
USCA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
UPGD 22nd cheapest of 30 funds
UPGD vs USCA Dividends
- UPGD 1.56%, better
- USCA 1.05%
- UPGD $1.29
- USCA $0.47
- UPGD $1.29
- USCA $0.10
- UPGD Dec 22, 2025
- USCA Sep 18, 2026
- UPGD Dec 26, 2025
- USCA Sep 25, 2026
- UPGD Annual
- USCA Quarterly
Distribution history
UPGD vs USCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- UPGD 13.7%USCA 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- UPGD 0.95USCA 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- UPGD −24.3%USCA −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- UPGD 0.95USCA 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.