UXJL vs XTAP: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July

UXJLDCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

XTAPBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XTAP −0.06pt a year

UXJL0.85%XTAP0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

XTAP 4.2×the volume

UXJL338XTAP1.43K

UXJL vs XTAP Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+12.4%UXJL+17.8%XTAP

Expense ratio: UXJL 0.85%; XTAP 0.79%, better
Fund size: UXJL $5M; XTAP $19M
1Y total return: UXJL +12.4%; XTAP +17.8%, better
Holdings: UXJL 3; XTAP 5
Avg volume (30D): UXJL 338 sh; XTAP 1.43K sh, better
NAV per share: UXJL $35.52; XTAP $46.32
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for UXJL, XTAP, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	UXJL	XTAP
Cost30% weight	F24	B63Higher
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	D30	A86Higher
Tradability15% weight	F20	C50Higher
Holdings10% weight	Not scored	B57
Durability5% weight	D31	A70Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. UXJL and XTAP are both graded against the same 12 S&P 500 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Accelerated⁠

Category · 12 funds

See all 12 ›

XTAP ranks 3rd and UXJL 11th of 12 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated Category.

Rank 1ATWOXiShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETFScore 68
Rank 2BMPDBm+ DynaBuffer ETFScore 67
Rank 3BXTAPInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETFScore 65
Rank 4BXTJAInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETFScore 62
Rank 11DBFXUFT Vest Laddered U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETFScore 25
Rank 11DUXJLFT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - JulyScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

UXJLDFT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July

XTAPBInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

In short

UXJL No data

XTAP Most equity funds hand you the market's move. XTAP aims to triple the S&P 500's gain over an April-to-March year, up to a cap, while taking declines roughly one for one. No buffer, no daily reset: you trade a ceiling for acceleration.

Stated mandate

UXJL No data

XTAP The fund seeks three times the increase of its S&P 500-tracking Underlying ETF over the annual April 1–March 31 outcome period, subject to a cap. It bears Underlying ETF losses one-for-one and provides no buffer; the current period is April 1, 2026 through March 31, 2027, with a 19.47% pre-fee cap.

Why people hold it

UXJL No data

XTAP Triples the index's upside to a cap using options that reset each April 1. No daily reset, no compounding drift from holding through a choppy stretch, no borrowed money.innovatoretfs.com
At 0.79% it sits at the going rate for accelerated funds and undercuts First Trust's enhance-and-buffer siblings on the same index (XMAR, XJUN) at 0.85%.
Live since 2021 and built to roll: the fund resets at the end of each outcome period and can be held straight through, so there is no annual ticker swap.innovatoretfs.com
One of the stronger implementations in its accelerated S&P 500 peer group on cost and structure.

Worth knowing

UXJL No data

XTAP The ceiling is the whole bargain. Upside stops at the cap, which is reset for each new period, and mid-period buyers get whatever cap is left rather than the headline number.innovatoretfs.com
No buffer here. Index declines land on you roughly one for one, and the outcomes are designed around holding from the first day of the period to the last.innovatoretfs.com
A small, lightly traded fund with no distributions in the past year, so wider spreads and a total-return-only profile come with the package.

Full UXJL profile⁠

Full XTAP profile⁠

UXJL vs XTAP Holdings

How UXJL and XTAP differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

About this figure: UXJL holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.

XTAP holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.

Level by level

Holdings0 in both0.0%
Sector11 Sectors97.8%
Countryby domicile99.97%

Sector

Sector weights in UXJL and XTAP, widest gap first
Sector	Gap	UXJL	XTAP
Technology	XTAP +1.1 points	39.4%	40.5%
Communication	XTAP +1.1 points	8.9%	9.9%
Financials	UXJL +0.6 points	11.7%	11.1%
Health Care	UXJL +0.5 points	9.8%	9.3%
Consumer Discretionary	UXJL +0.3 points	9.1%	8.8%
Energy	UXJL +0.3 points	3.7%	3.4%
Consumer Staples	UXJL +0.3 points	4.6%	4.3%
Utilities	UXJL +0.1 points	2.0%	1.9%
Industrials	XTAP +0.1 points	7.5%	7.5%
Real Estate	Same weight	1.7%	1.7%
Materials	XTAP +0.1 points	1.5%	1.6%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in UXJL and XTAP, widest gap first
Country	Gap	UXJL	XTAP
United States	Same weight	99.5%	99.5%
Switzerland	Same weight	0.3%	0.3%
China	Same weight	0.1%	0.1%
Mexico	XTAP +0.1 points	0.0%	0.1%
Ireland	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%
United Kingdom	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

UXJL106.8%
XTAP129.0%

Securities held

UXJL2
XTAP4

Asset class

UXJL: Multi-Asset
XTAP: Stocks

Holdings

Only in UXJL2
In both0
Only in XTAP4

Only in UXJL

2 securities, 100% of UXJL by weight

2027-07-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 14.8796.64%
2027-07-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 758.166.80%

Only in XTAP

4 securities, 100% of XTAP by weight

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF99.19%
Voo 03/31/2027 597.57 C29.02%
Voo 03/31/2027 621.47 C0.25%
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.05%

Weight gaps

UXJL and XTAP share no securities.

All 3 UXJL holdings⁠All 5 XTAP holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

UXJL vs XTAP Cost

Overpaying UXJL vs XTAP

$1,025

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

UXJL 0.85%
$16,199
XTAP 0.79%
$15,174

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

UXJL 0.85%
XTAP 0.79%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	UXJL	XTAP	Overpaying
10	$1,508	$1,405	$103
20	$5,706	$5,331	$375
30	$16,199	$15,174	$1,025

Expense ratio

0.85%UXJL
0.79%XTAP, cheaper

XTAP0.79%UXJL0.85%

0.53%0.95%

Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated funds
Median 0.79%

XTAP 3rd cheapest of 12 funds

UXJL 8th cheapest of 12 funds

UXJL vs XTAP Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026

Payout (12M): UXJL None; XTAP None

Distribution history

UXJLAll UXJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTAPAll XTAP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UXJL vs XTAP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: UXJL 14.1%since Aug 2025XTAP 6.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: UXJL 0.86since Aug 2025XTAP 1.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: UXJL −10.3%since Jul 2025XTAP −22.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: UXJL 1.16XTAP 0.48; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

UXJLDvsTWOXA
FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July · iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.53%
Category
XTAPBvsTWOXA
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF · iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF
Expense ratio
0.79% · 0.53%
Category
UXJLDvsMPDBB
FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July · m+ DynaBuffer ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.70%
Category
XTAPBvsMPDBB
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF · m+ DynaBuffer ETF
Expense ratio
0.79% · 0.70%
Category
UXJLDvsXTJAB
FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.79%
Category
XTAPBvsXTJAB
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
Expense ratio
0.79% · 0.79%
Category