VGLT ranks 1st and ZROZ 9th of 11 funds in the Treasuries (20+ Year) Category.
VGLT vs ZROZ
VGLT −0.12pt a year
0.03%0.15%
VGLT 2.9×the volume
2.93M1M
VGLT +3.3pt
−1.2%−4.5%
VGLT vs ZROZ Performance
−29.3%−53.5%
- VGLT 0.03%, better
- ZROZ 0.15%
- VGLT $14.9B
- ZROZ $1.88B
- VGLT −4.1%, better
- ZROZ −10.7%
- VGLT 4.81%
- ZROZ 5.24%, better
- VGLT 104
- ZROZ 21
- VGLT 2.93M sh, better
- ZROZ 1M sh
- VGLT $52.49
- ZROZ $58.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VGLT | ZROZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | B63Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | A81Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A87Higher | A74 |
Rank among Treasuries (20+ Year) funds
Same Category. VGLT and ZROZ are both graded against the same 11 Treasuries (20+ Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VGLTA
ZROZB
In short
VGLT Three basis points for the long end of the Treasury curve. VGLT tracks a market-weighted index of long-dated government bonds, pays income monthly, and charges a fraction of what this category typically costs.
ZROZ Nothing but Treasury principal STRIPS, 25 years and out, with zero coupons attached. PIMCO launched it in 2009, and it reacts to long-rate moves harder than standard long Treasury funds.
Stated mandate
VGLT The fund seeks to track a market-weighted Treasury index with a long-term dollar-weighted average maturity. It uses index sampling and invests at least 80% of assets in securities included in the target index.
ZROZ The fund seeks total returns that closely track the ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index before fees and expenses. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in the index's component securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VGLT vs ZROZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VGLT vs ZROZ Cost
Overpaying ZROZ vs VGLT
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VGLT 0.03%
$638
ZROZ 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VGLT | ZROZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $274 | $219 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,071 | $855 |
| 30 | $638 | $3,137 | $2,499 |
- 0.03%VGLT, cheaper
- 0.15%ZROZ
- Middle half of Treasuries (20+ Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
VGLT cheapest of 11 funds
ZROZ 6th cheapest of 11 funds
VGLT vs ZROZ Dividends
- VGLT 4.81%
- ZROZ 5.24%, better
- VGLT $2.52
- ZROZ $3.06
- VGLT $0.21
- ZROZ $0.55
- VGLT Oct 1, 2026
- ZROZ Oct 1, 2026
- VGLT Oct 5, 2026
- ZROZ Oct 5, 2026
- VGLT Monthly
- ZROZ Quarterly
Distribution history
VGLT vs ZROZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- VGLT
- ZROZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VGLT 12.3%, betterZROZ 21.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- VGLT 0.04, betterZROZ −0.07
- Worst fall
- VGLT −41.0%, betterZROZ −60.9%
- Market sensitivity
- VGLT 2.25ZROZ 3.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


