TLT ranks 4th and ZROZ 9th of 11 funds in the Treasuries (20+ Year) Category.
TLT vs ZROZ
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.15%0.15%
TLT 34.8×the volume
34.8M1M
TLT +2.7pt
−1.8%−4.5%
TLT vs ZROZ Performance
−33.7%−53.5%
- TLT 0.15%
- ZROZ 0.15%
- TLT $47.5B
- ZROZ $1.88B
- TLT −5.1%, better
- ZROZ −10.7%
- TLT 4.75%
- ZROZ 5.24%, better
- TLT 49
- ZROZ 21
- TLT 34.8M sh, better
- ZROZ 1M sh
- TLT $81.80
- ZROZ $58.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TLT | ZROZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | D37 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | B57Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | A91Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | B64Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A89Higher | A74 |
Rank among Treasuries (20+ Year) funds
Same Category. TLT and ZROZ are both graded against the same 11 Treasuries (20+ Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TLTB
ZROZB
In short
TLT The long bond's most famous ticker. iShares launched TLT in 2002, and it became the default way to take a view on 20-year-plus Treasuries: index-tracked, heavily traded, with a deep listed options market.
ZROZ Nothing but Treasury principal STRIPS, 25 years and out, with zero coupons attached. PIMCO launched it in 2009, and it reacts to long-rate moves harder than standard long Treasury funds.
Stated mandate
TLT The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury bonds with remaining maturities greater than twenty years, providing targeted exposure to long-duration government debt.
ZROZ The fund seeks total returns that closely track the ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index before fees and expenses. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in the index's component securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TLT vs ZROZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TLT vs ZROZ Cost
Same expense ratio
$3,137
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TLT 0.15%
$3,137
ZROZ 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TLT | ZROZ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $274 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,071 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $3,137 |
- 0.15%TLT
- 0.15%ZROZ
- Middle half of Treasuries (20+ Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
TLT 6th cheapest of 11 funds
ZROZ 6th cheapest of 11 funds
TLT vs ZROZ Dividends
- TLT 4.75%
- ZROZ 5.24%, better
- TLT $3.89
- ZROZ $3.06
- TLT $0.31
- ZROZ $0.55
- TLT Oct 1, 2026
- ZROZ Oct 1, 2026
- TLT Oct 6, 2026
- ZROZ Oct 5, 2026
- TLT Monthly
- ZROZ Quarterly
Distribution history
TLT vs ZROZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- TLT
- ZROZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TLT 13.5%, betterZROZ 21.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- TLT −0.002, betterZROZ −0.07
- Worst fall
- TLT −43.7%, betterZROZ −60.9%
- Market sensitivity
- TLT 2.40ZROZ 3.67
TLT and ZROZ in the news

Category Rankings
Chips, AI and crypto took October's losses





Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.