VTV ranks 2nd and VLU 6th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
VLU vs VTV
VTV −0.09pt a year
0.12%0.03%
VTV 353.8×the volume
7.99K2.83M
VLU +1.1pt
+14.1%+13.0%
VLU vs VTV Performance
+79.9%+79.8%
- VLU 0.12%
- VTV 0.03%, better
- VLU $793M
- VTV $252B
- VLU +22.1%
- VTV +25.3%, better
- VLU 1.61%
- VTV 1.83%, better
- VLU 1451
- VTV 300
- VLU 7.99K sh
- VTV 2.83M sh, better
- VLU $248.51
- VTV $228.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VLU | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A89 |
| Risk | A77 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | B62Higher | C51 |
| Durability | B64 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. VLU and VTV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VLUA
VTVA
In short
VLU Most value funds throw out half the market. VLU keeps all roughly 1,500 names in the S&P Composite 1500 and simply leans the weights toward the cheaper ones. Running since 2012.
VTV Value investing for three cents on every hundred dollars a year. Since 2004, VTV has run a passive, fully invested portfolio of roughly 300 large US companies that screen cheap, at a fee near the industry floor.
Stated mandate
VLU The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index.
VTV The fund seeks to track a large-capitalization U.S. value-stock benchmark through passive indexing and substantial replication of that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VLU vs VTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VLU vs VTV Cost
Overpaying VLU vs VTV
$1,882
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VLU 0.12%
$2,520
VTV 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VLU | VTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $55 | $165 |
| 20 | $859 | $216 | $643 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $638 | $1,882 |
- 0.12%VLU
- 0.03%VTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
VTV cheapest of 40 funds
VLU 10th cheapest of 40 funds
VLU vs VTV Dividends
- VLU 1.61%
- VTV 1.83%, better
- VLU $3.97
- VTV $4.16
- VLU $1.05
- VTV $1.02
- VLU Sep 21, 2026
- VTV Sep 28, 2026
- VLU Sep 23, 2026
- VTV Sep 30, 2026
- VLU Quarterly
- VTV Quarterly
Distribution history
VLU vs VTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- VLU
- VTV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VLU 11.6%VTV 11.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- VLU 1.47, betterVTV 1.44
- Worst fall
- VLU −19.6%VTV −17.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- VLU 0.88VTV 0.69
VLU and VTV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





