XCEM ranks 2nd and XSOE 4th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
XCEM vs XSOE
XCEM −0.16pt a year
0.16%0.32%
XCEM 1.7×the volume
162K97K
XCEM +1.9pt
+9.8%+7.9%
XCEM vs XSOE Performance
+61.9%+22.0%
- XCEM 0.16%, better
- XSOE 0.32%
- XCEM $2.01B
- XSOE $1.91B
- XCEM +24.3%, better
- XSOE +10.5%
- XCEM 2.68%, better
- XSOE 1.82%
- XCEM 465
- XSOE 866
- XCEM 162K sh, better
- XSOE 97K sh
- XCEM $46.99
- XSOE $43.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XCEM | XSOE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C51Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | B60Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A78 | A81Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. XCEM and XSOE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XCEMA
XSOEA
In short
XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.
XSOE One screen, applied hard: if a government owns more than 20% of a company, XSOE leaves it out. What is left is emerging markets minus the state champions, with country weights pushed back toward the standard EM mix.
Stated mandate
XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.
XSOE The fund seeks to track the investment results of emerging-market companies that are not state-owned enterprises, defined as companies with no more than 20% government ownership.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XCEM vs XSOE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XCEM vs XSOE Cost
Overpaying XSOE vs XCEM
$3,200
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XCEM 0.16%
$3,342
XSOE 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XCEM | XSOE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $580 | $288 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $2,250 | $1,109 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $6,542 | $3,200 |
- 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
- 0.32%XSOE
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
XSOE 6th cheapest of 20 funds
XCEM vs XSOE Dividends
- XCEM 2.68%, better
- XSOE 1.82%
- XCEM $1.25
- XSOE $0.78
- XCEM $1.25
- XSOE $0.22
- XCEM Dec 18, 2025
- XSOE Sep 25, 2026
- XCEM Dec 26, 2025
- XSOE Sep 29, 2026
- XCEM Annual
- XSOE Quarterly
Distribution history
XCEM vs XSOE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- XCEM
- XSOE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XCEM 20.0%XSOE 17.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- XCEM 0.95, betterXSOE 0.90
- Worst fall
- XCEM −29.5%, betterXSOE −37.2%
- Market sensitivity
- XCEM 1.27XSOE 1.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

