XCEM ranks 2nd and BKEM 3rd of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
BKEM vs XCEM
BKEM −0.05pt a year
0.11%0.16%
XCEM 10.6×the volume
15.4K162K
XCEM +3.8pt
+6.3%+10.1%
BKEM vs XCEM Performance
+35.8%+61.9%
- BKEM 0.11%, better
- XCEM 0.16%
- BKEM $101M
- XCEM $2.01B
- BKEM +12.7%
- XCEM +24.3%, better
- BKEM 1.25%
- XCEM 2.68%, better
- BKEM 1805
- XCEM 465
- BKEM 15.4K sh
- XCEM 162K sh, better
- BKEM $28.09
- XCEM $46.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKEM | XCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | A90 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | F23 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | C48 | A78Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. BKEM and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKEMA
XCEMA
In short
BKEM The whole emerging world, priced like an afterthought. BNY Mellon charges 0.11% to hold well over a thousand large- and mid-cap stocks across developing markets. Broad, cheap, and very quiet.
XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.
Stated mandate
BKEM The fund is designed to follow the performance of an emerging-markets large- and mid-cap equity index.
XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKEM vs XCEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKEM vs XCEM Cost
Overpaying XCEM vs BKEM
$1,029
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKEM 0.11%
$2,313
XCEM 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKEM | XCEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $201 | $292 | $91 |
| 20 | $788 | $1,141 | $353 |
| 30 | $2,313 | $3,342 | $1,029 |
- 0.11%BKEM, cheaper
- 0.16%XCEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
BKEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
BKEM vs XCEM Dividends
- BKEM 1.25%
- XCEM 2.68%, better
- BKEM $0.35
- XCEM $1.25
- BKEM $0.28
- XCEM $1.25
- BKEM Jul 1, 2026
- XCEM Dec 18, 2025
- BKEM Jul 7, 2026
- XCEM Dec 26, 2025
- BKEM Twice a year
- XCEM Annual
Distribution history
BKEM vs XCEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BKEM
- XCEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKEM 16.2%, betterXCEM 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BKEM 0.98, betterXCEM 0.95
- Worst fall
- BKEM −31.9%XCEM −29.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BKEM 1.12XCEM 1.27
BKEM and XCEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.11% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

