AAPD ranks 1st and METD 13th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs METD
AAPD −0.06pt a year
0.96%1.02%
AAPD 11.6×the volume
8.8M761K
AAPD vs METD Performance
−21.5%−5.3%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- METD 1.02%
- AAPD $24M
- METD $9M
- AAPD −21.5%
- METD −5.3%, better
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- METD 2.40%
- AAPD 4
- METD 4
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- METD 761K sh
- AAPD $9.86
- METD $14.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | METD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A85Higher | A83 |
| Risk | A75Higher | A73 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | B62 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and METD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
METDA
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
METD A one-for-one short on Meta, wrapped in an ETF. METD targets 100% of the inverse of Meta's daily move: no leverage multiplier, no margin account, and exposure that resets every day.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
METD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Meta Platforms, Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs METD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs METD Cost
Overpaying METD vs AAPD
$978
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
METD 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | METD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,797 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,746 | $363 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $19,012 | $978 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.02%METD
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
METD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs METD Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- METD 2.40%
- AAPD $0.45
- METD $0.36
- AAPD $0.18
- METD $0.06
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- METD Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- METD Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- METD Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs METD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%METD 34.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32METD −0.43
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%METD −50.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84METD −1.52
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.