TSDD ranks 2nd and METD 13th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
METD vs TSDD
TSDD −0.04pt a year
1.02%0.98%
TSDD 14.5×the volume
761K11M
METD vs TSDD Performance
−5.3%−24.7%
- METD 1.02%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- METD $9M
- TSDD $31M
- METD −5.3%, better
- TSDD −24.7%
- METD 2.40%
- TSDD 10.55%, better
- METD 4
- TSDD 1
- METD 761K sh
- TSDD 11M sh, better
- METD $14.79
- TSDD $6.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | METD | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A73Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | C41 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B62 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. METD and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
METDA
TSDDA
In short
METD A one-for-one short on Meta, wrapped in an ETF. METD targets 100% of the inverse of Meta's daily move: no leverage multiplier, no margin account, and exposure that resets every day.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
METD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Meta Platforms, Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
METD vs TSDD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
METD vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying METD vs TSDD
$650
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
METD 1.02%
$19,012
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | METD | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $1,729 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $6,504 | $242 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $18,362 | $650 |
- 1.02%METD
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
METD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
METD vs TSDD Dividends
- METD 2.40%
- TSDD 10.55%, better
- METD $0.36
- TSDD $0.65
- METD $0.06
- TSDD $0.65
- METD Sep 22, 2026
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- METD Sep 29, 2026
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- METD Quarterly
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
METD vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- METD 34.3%TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- METD −0.43TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- METD −50.6%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- METD −1.52TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.