AAPD ranks 1st and MSTZ 17th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs MSTZ
AAPD −0.09pt a year
0.96%1.05%
MSTZ 4.0×the volume
8.8M34.9M
AAPD vs MSTZ Performance
−21.5%−50.7%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- MSTZ 1.05%
- AAPD $24M
- MSTZ $75M
- AAPD −21.5%, better
- MSTZ −50.7%
- AAPD 4.51%
- MSTZ
- AAPD 4
- MSTZ 2
- AAPD 8.8M sh
- MSTZ 34.9M sh, better
- AAPD $9.86
- MSTZ $2.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | MSTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B65 |
| Mission | A85 | A88Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | B68 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and MSTZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
MSTZB
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
MSTZ A double-inverse day trade on MicroStrategy in a single ticker. MSTZ aims to deliver -2x MSTR's move each day, resets every night, and charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund. Built for short holds, by design.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
MSTZ The fund seeks inverse leveraged daily investment results tied to MSTR and is designed for short-term trading.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs MSTZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs MSTZ Cost
Overpaying MSTZ vs AAPD
$1,461
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
MSTZ 1.05%
$19,495
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | MSTZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,847 | $152 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,927 | $544 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $19,495 | $1,461 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.05%MSTZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
MSTZ 20th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs MSTZ Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%
- MSTZ
- AAPD $0.45
- MSTZ None
- AAPD $0.18
- MSTZ
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- MSTZ
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- MSTZ
- AAPD Quarterly
- MSTZ
Distribution history
AAPD vs MSTZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%MSTZ 185.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32MSTZ −0.21
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%MSTZ −99.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84MSTZ −3.35
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.