TSDD ranks 2nd and MSTZ 17th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
MSTZ vs TSDD
0.0%by weight
TSDD −0.07pt a year
1.05%0.98%
MSTZ 3.2×the volume
34.9M11M
MSTZ vs TSDD Performance
−50.7%−24.7%
- MSTZ 1.05%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- MSTZ $75M
- TSDD $31M
- MSTZ −50.7%
- TSDD −24.7%, better
- MSTZ
- TSDD 10.55%
- MSTZ 2
- TSDD 1
- MSTZ 34.9M sh, better
- TSDD 11M sh
- MSTZ $2.85
- TSDD $6.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MSTZ | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A88 | A98Higher |
| Risk | C47 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B68 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. MSTZ and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MSTZB
TSDDA
In short
MSTZ A double-inverse day trade on MicroStrategy in a single ticker. MSTZ aims to deliver -2x MSTR's move each day, resets every night, and charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund. Built for short holds, by design.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
MSTZ The fund seeks inverse leveraged daily investment results tied to MSTR and is designed for short-term trading.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MSTZ vs TSDD Holdings
How MSTZ and TSDD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of MSTZ and 0.0% of TSDD.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for MSTZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for MSTZ.
Concentration
- MSTZ102.8%
- TSDD199.9%
- MSTZ1
- TSDD1
Asset class
- MSTZ
- Equity
- TSDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in MSTZ1
- In both0
- Only in TSDD1
Only in MSTZ
1 security, 4.8% of MSTZ by weight
- Strg Trs Mstr Eq4.78%
Only in TSDD
1 security, 100% of TSDD by weight
- Tsla199.89%
Weight gaps
MSTZ and TSDD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MSTZ vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying MSTZ vs TSDD
$1,133
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MSTZ 1.05%
$19,495
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MSTZ | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $1,729 | $118 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $6,504 | $423 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $18,362 | $1,133 |
- 1.05%MSTZ
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
MSTZ 20th cheapest of 43 funds
MSTZ vs TSDD Dividends
- MSTZ
- TSDD 10.55%
- MSTZ None
- TSDD $0.65
- MSTZ
- TSDD $0.65
- MSTZ
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- MSTZ
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- MSTZ
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
MSTZ vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MSTZ 185.8%TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MSTZ −0.21TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- MSTZ −99.5%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MSTZ −3.35TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.