AAPD ranks 1st and NVDQ 19th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs NVDQ
AAPD −0.09pt a year
0.96%1.05%
AAPD 1.6×the volume
8.8M5.51M
AAPD +61.1pt
−21.3%−82.4%
AAPD vs NVDQ Performance
−21.5%−34.8%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- NVDQ 1.05%
- AAPD $24M
- NVDQ $17M
- AAPD −21.5%, better
- NVDQ −34.8%
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- NVDQ 0.44%
- AAPD 4
- NVDQ 2
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- NVDQ 5.51M sh
- AAPD $9.86
- NVDQ $9.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | NVDQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B65 |
| Mission | A85 | A92Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | B58 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and NVDQ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
NVDQB
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
NVDQ One ticker, one bet: NVDQ aims to deliver 200% of the inverse of Nvidia's daily move, so a 1% slip in NVDA targets a 2% gain that day. T-REX built it as a day-trader's tool, and the math resets every session.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
NVDQ The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the inverse of NVDA's daily performance. It is designed as a short-term trading vehicle and does not target results beyond a single trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs NVDQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs NVDQ Cost
Overpaying NVDQ vs AAPD
$1,461
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
NVDQ 1.05%
$19,495
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | NVDQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,847 | $152 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,927 | $544 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $19,495 | $1,461 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.05%NVDQ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
NVDQ 20th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs NVDQ Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- NVDQ 0.44%
- AAPD $0.45
- NVDQ $0.04
- AAPD $0.18
- NVDQ $0.04
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- NVDQ Dec 24, 2025
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- NVDQ Dec 26, 2025
- AAPD Quarterly
- NVDQ Annual
Distribution history
AAPD vs NVDQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%, betterNVDQ 60.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32, betterNVDQ −2.40
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%NVDQ −99.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84NVDQ −2.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.