TSDD ranks 2nd and NVDQ 19th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
NVDQ vs TSDD
0.0%by weight
TSDD −0.07pt a year
1.05%0.98%
TSDD 2.0×the volume
5.51M11M
TSDD +7.1pt
−82.4%−75.3%
NVDQ vs TSDD Performance
−34.8%−24.7%
- NVDQ 1.05%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- NVDQ $17M
- TSDD $31M
- NVDQ −34.8%
- TSDD −24.7%, better
- NVDQ 0.44%
- TSDD 10.55%, better
- NVDQ 2
- TSDD 1
- NVDQ 5.51M sh
- TSDD 11M sh, better
- NVDQ $9.14
- TSDD $6.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NVDQ | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A98Higher |
| Risk | D33 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B58 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. NVDQ and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NVDQB
TSDDA
In short
NVDQ One ticker, one bet: NVDQ aims to deliver 200% of the inverse of Nvidia's daily move, so a 1% slip in NVDA targets a 2% gain that day. T-REX built it as a day-trader's tool, and the math resets every session.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
NVDQ The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the inverse of NVDA's daily performance. It is designed as a short-term trading vehicle and does not target results beyond a single trading day.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NVDQ vs TSDD Holdings
How NVDQ and TSDD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NVDQ and 0.0% of TSDD.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for NVDQ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for NVDQ.
Concentration
- NVDQ118.9%
- TSDD199.9%
- NVDQ1
- TSDD1
Asset class
- NVDQ
- Equity
- TSDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in NVDQ1
- In both0
- Only in TSDD1
Only in NVDQ
1 security, 27.2% of NVDQ by weight
- Payb Nvdq Trs Nvda Eq27.21%
Only in TSDD
1 security, 100% of TSDD by weight
- Tsla199.89%
Weight gaps
NVDQ and TSDD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NVDQ vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying NVDQ vs TSDD
$1,133
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NVDQ 1.05%
$19,495
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NVDQ | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $1,729 | $118 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $6,504 | $423 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $18,362 | $1,133 |
- 1.05%NVDQ
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
NVDQ 20th cheapest of 43 funds
NVDQ vs TSDD Dividends
- NVDQ 0.44%
- TSDD 10.55%, better
- NVDQ $0.04
- TSDD $0.65
- NVDQ $0.04
- TSDD $0.65
- NVDQ Dec 24, 2025
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- NVDQ Dec 26, 2025
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- NVDQ Annual
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
NVDQ vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NVDQ 60.6%, betterTSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- NVDQ −2.40TSDD −0.87, better
- Worst fall
- NVDQ −99.6%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- NVDQ −2.94TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.