AAPD ranks 1st and NVDS 14th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs NVDS
AAPD −0.19pt a year
0.96%1.15%
AAPD 32.2×the volume
8.8M274K
AAPD +42.5pt
−19.7%−62.2%
AAPD vs NVDS Performance
−20.1%−16.8%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- NVDS 1.15%
- AAPD $35M
- NVDS $14M
- AAPD −20.1%
- NVDS −16.8%, better
- AAPD 4.43%
- NVDS 18.89%, better
- AAPD 5
- NVDS 2
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- NVDS 274K sh
- AAPD $9.98
- NVDS $21.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | NVDS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B61 |
| Mission | A85 | A99Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A79Higher | B55 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and NVDS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
NVDSB
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
NVDS The original inverse NVIDIA ETF, trading since 2022, and the one that dials short exposure to 1.5x instead of 1x. Built for a single session at a time, at 1.15% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
NVDS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to one and a half times the inverse performance of NVIDIA common shares. It is designed to pursue this objective for a single trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs NVDS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs NVDS Cost
Overpaying NVDS vs AAPD
$3,043
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
NVDS 1.15%
$21,077
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | NVDS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $2,015 | $320 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $7,521 | $1,138 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $21,077 | $3,043 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.15%NVDS
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
NVDS 23rd cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs NVDS Dividends
- AAPD 4.43%
- NVDS 18.89%, better
- AAPD $0.45
- NVDS $3.97
- AAPD $0.18
- NVDS $3.97
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- NVDS Dec 23, 2025
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- NVDS Dec 26, 2025
- AAPD Quarterly
- NVDS Annual
Distribution history
AAPD vs NVDS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%, betterNVDS 44.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32, betterNVDS −2.05
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%NVDS −99.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84NVDS −2.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.