AMZD ranks 4th and NVDS 14th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs NVDS
0.0%by weight
AMZD −0.13pt a year
1.02%1.15%
AMZD 44.6×the volume
12.2M274K
AMZD +42.1pt
−20.1%−62.2%
AMZD vs NVDS Performance
−5.6%−16.8%
- AMZD 1.02%, better
- NVDS 1.15%
- AMZD $18M
- NVDS $14M
- AMZD −5.6%, better
- NVDS −16.8%
- AMZD 2.71%
- NVDS 18.89%, better
- AMZD 3
- NVDS 2
- AMZD 12.2M sh, better
- NVDS 274K sh
- AMZD $9.03
- NVDS $21.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | NVDS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | B61 |
| Mission | A96 | A99Higher |
| Risk | A72Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A70Higher | B55 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and NVDS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
NVDSB
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
NVDS The original inverse NVIDIA ETF, trading since 2022, and the one that dials short exposure to 1.5x instead of 1x. Built for a single session at a time, at 1.15% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
NVDS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to one and a half times the inverse performance of NVIDIA common shares. It is designed to pursue this objective for a single trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs NVDS Holdings
How AMZD and NVDS differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AMZD and 0.0% of NVDS.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMZD and NVDS.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AMZD.
Concentration
- AMZD1816.7%
- NVDS118.8%
- AMZD1
- NVDS2
Asset class
- AMZD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- NVDS
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AMZD1
- In both0
- Only in NVDS2
Only in AMZD
1 security, 100% of AMZD by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 506597.32%
Only in NVDS
2 securities, 100% of NVDS by weight
- Cashusd111.33%
- Trs NVIDIA Corp7.45%
Weight gaps
AMZD and NVDS share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs NVDS Cost
Overpaying NVDS vs AMZD
$2,065
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
NVDS 1.15%
$21,077
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | NVDS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $2,015 | $218 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $7,521 | $775 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $21,077 | $2,065 |
- 1.02%AMZD, cheaper
- 1.15%NVDS
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
NVDS 23rd cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs NVDS Dividends
- AMZD 2.71%
- NVDS 18.89%, better
- AMZD $0.24
- NVDS $3.97
- AMZD $0.05
- NVDS $3.97
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- NVDS Dec 23, 2025
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- NVDS Dec 26, 2025
- AMZD Quarterly
- NVDS Annual
Distribution history
AMZD vs NVDS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%, betterNVDS 44.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86, betterNVDS −2.05
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%NVDS −99.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.26NVDS −2.23
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.