AAPD ranks 1st and QCMD 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs QCMD
0.0%by weight
AAPD −0.04pt a year
0.96%1.00%
AAPD 421.8×the volume
8.8M20.9K
AAPD vs QCMD Performance
−21.5%−14.5%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- QCMD 1.00%
- AAPD $24M
- QCMD $2M
- AAPD −21.5%
- QCMD −14.5%, better
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- QCMD 3.20%
- AAPD 4
- QCMD 4
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- QCMD 20.9K sh
- AAPD $9.86
- QCMD $15.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | QCMD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A89 |
| Mission | A85Higher | A82 |
| Risk | A75Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | C41 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and QCMD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
QCMDC
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
QCMD A one-for-one short on Qualcomm in an ETF wrapper: no margin account, no borrow, just -100% of QCOM's move, reset daily. Priced at 1.00% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
QCMD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to the performance of QUALCOMM Incorporated common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs QCMD Holdings
How AAPD and QCMD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AAPD and 0.0% of QCMD.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AAPD and QCMD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AAPD.
Concentration
- AAPD490.0%
- QCMD1985.2%
- AAPD2
- QCMD0
Asset class
- AAPD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- QCMD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in AAPD2
- In both0
- Only in QCMD0
Only in AAPD
2 securities, 100% of AAPD by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50686.03%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut15.66%
Only in QCMD
0 securities, 0.0% of QCMD by weight
Weight gaps
AAPD and QCMD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs QCMD Cost
Overpaying QCMD vs AAPD
$654
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
QCMD 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | QCMD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,763 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,625 | $242 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $18,688 | $654 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.00%QCMD
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
QCMD 8th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs QCMD Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- QCMD 3.20%
- AAPD $0.45
- QCMD $0.55
- AAPD $0.18
- QCMD $0.11
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- QCMD Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- QCMD Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- QCMD Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs QCMD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%QCMD 59.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32QCMD −0.15
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%QCMD −56.0%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84QCMD −3.60
AAPD and QCMD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
