TSDD ranks 2nd and QCMD 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
QCMD vs TSDD
0.0%by weight
TSDD −0.02pt a year
1.00%0.98%
TSDD 527.1×the volume
20.9K11M
QCMD vs TSDD Performance
−14.5%−24.7%
- QCMD 1.00%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- QCMD $2M
- TSDD $31M
- QCMD −14.5%, better
- TSDD −24.7%
- QCMD 3.20%
- TSDD 10.55%, better
- QCMD 4
- TSDD 1
- QCMD 20.9K sh
- TSDD 11M sh, better
- QCMD $15.58
- TSDD $6.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QCMD | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A82 | A98Higher |
| Risk | B65Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D32 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C41 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. QCMD and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QCMDC
TSDDA
In short
QCMD A one-for-one short on Qualcomm in an ETF wrapper: no margin account, no borrow, just -100% of QCOM's move, reset daily. Priced at 1.00% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
QCMD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to the performance of QUALCOMM Incorporated common shares.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QCMD vs TSDD Holdings
How QCMD and TSDD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QCMD and 0.0% of TSDD.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for QCMD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in QCMDMore in TSDD | QCMD | TSDD |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- QCMD1985.2%
- TSDD199.9%
- QCMD0
- TSDD1
Asset class
- QCMD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in QCMD0
- In both0
- Only in TSDD1
Only in QCMD
0 securities, 0.0% of QCMD by weight
Only in TSDD
1 security, 100% of TSDD by weight
- Tsla199.89%
Weight gaps
QCMD and TSDD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QCMD vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying QCMD vs TSDD
$326
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QCMD 1.00%
$18,688
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QCMD | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,729 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,504 | $121 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,362 | $326 |
- 1.00%QCMD
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
QCMD 8th cheapest of 43 funds
QCMD vs TSDD Dividends
- QCMD 3.20%
- TSDD 10.55%, better
- QCMD $0.55
- TSDD $0.65
- QCMD $0.11
- TSDD $0.65
- QCMD Sep 22, 2026
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- QCMD Sep 29, 2026
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- QCMD Quarterly
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
QCMD vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QCMD 59.4%TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- QCMD −0.15TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- QCMD −56.0%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- QCMD −3.60TSDD −2.40
QCMD and TSDD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
