AAPD ranks 1st and RKLZ 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs RKLZ
AAPD −0.33pt a year
0.96%1.29%
AAPD 3.1×the volume
8.8M2.82M
AAPD vs RKLZ Performance
−21.6%−89.5%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- RKLZ 1.29%
- AAPD $24M
- RKLZ $3M
- AAPD −21.5%
- RKLZ
- AAPD 4.51%
- RKLZ
- AAPD 4
- RKLZ 1
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- RKLZ 2.82M sh
- AAPD $9.86
- RKLZ $21.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | RKLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A85 | A99Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | F12 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | D37 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and RKLZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
RKLZC
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
RKLZ Nearly every inverse single-stock ETF points at a mega-cap. Defiance aimed this one at a rocket builder: RKLZ seeks -2x Rocket Lab's daily move, reset each day. A one-session tool on one of the market's twitchiest space names.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
RKLZ The fund seeks amplified inverse daily exposure to the common stock of Rocket Lab Corporation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs RKLZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs RKLZ Cost
Overpaying RKLZ vs AAPD
$5,185
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
RKLZ 1.29%
$23,219
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | RKLZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $2,247 | $552 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $8,335 | $1,952 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $23,219 | $5,185 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.29%RKLZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
RKLZ 25th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs RKLZ Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%
- RKLZ
- AAPD $0.45
- RKLZ None
- AAPD $0.18
- RKLZ
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- RKLZ
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- RKLZ
- AAPD Quarterly
- RKLZ
Distribution history
AAPD vs RKLZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%RKLZ
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32RKLZ
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%RKLZ
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84RKLZ −5.24
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.29% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.29% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.29% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.