AAPD ranks 1st and TSLS 3rd of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs TSLS
TSLS −0.01pt a year
0.96%0.95%
AAPD 21.5×the volume
8.8M410K
AAPD +17.2pt
−21.3%−38.5%
AAPD vs TSLS Performance
−21.5%+1.0%
- AAPD 0.96%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- AAPD $24M
- TSLS $39M
- AAPD −21.5%
- TSLS +1.0%, better
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- TSLS 3.11%
- AAPD 4
- TSLS 4
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- TSLS 410K sh
- AAPD $9.86
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97 | A97 |
| Mission | A85 | A87Higher |
| Risk | A75 | A75 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
TSLSA
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying AAPD vs TSLS
$165
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,678 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,322 | $61 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $17,869 | $165 |
- 0.96%AAPD
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs TSLS Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- TSLS 3.11%
- AAPD $0.45
- TSLS $1.57
- AAPD $0.18
- TSLS $0.40
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%, betterTSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32TSLS −0.76, better
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.