TSLS ranks 3rd and RKLZ 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
RKLZ vs TSLS
TSLS −0.34pt a year
1.29%0.95%
RKLZ 6.9×the volume
2.82M410K
RKLZ vs TSLS Performance
−89.5%+1.5%
- RKLZ 1.29%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- RKLZ $3M
- TSLS $39M
- RKLZ
- TSLS +1.0%
- RKLZ
- TSLS 3.11%
- RKLZ 1
- TSLS 4
- RKLZ 2.82M sh, better
- TSLS 410K sh
- RKLZ $21.63
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RKLZ | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A87 |
| Risk | F12 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D37 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. RKLZ and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RKLZC
TSLSA
In short
RKLZ Nearly every inverse single-stock ETF points at a mega-cap. Defiance aimed this one at a rocket builder: RKLZ seeks -2x Rocket Lab's daily move, reset each day. A one-session tool on one of the market's twitchiest space names.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
RKLZ The fund seeks amplified inverse daily exposure to the common stock of Rocket Lab Corporation.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RKLZ vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RKLZ vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying RKLZ vs TSLS
$5,350
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RKLZ 1.29%
$23,219
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RKLZ | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,247 | $1,678 | $569 |
| 20 | $8,335 | $6,322 | $2,013 |
| 30 | $23,219 | $17,869 | $5,350 |
- 1.29%RKLZ
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
RKLZ 25th cheapest of 43 funds
RKLZ vs TSLS Dividends
- RKLZ
- TSLS 3.11%
- RKLZ None
- TSLS $1.57
- RKLZ
- TSLS $0.40
- RKLZ
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- RKLZ
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- RKLZ
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
RKLZ vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RKLZ TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- RKLZ TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- RKLZ TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- RKLZ −5.24TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 1.29% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.29% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.29% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.