AAPD ranks 1st and SMCZ 37th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs SMCZ
AAPD −0.59pt a year
0.96%1.55%
AAPD 4.5×the volume
8.8M1.96M
AAPD vs SMCZ Performance
−21.5%−86.9%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- SMCZ 1.55%
- AAPD $24M
- SMCZ $2M
- AAPD −21.5%, better
- SMCZ −86.9%
- AAPD 4.51%
- SMCZ
- AAPD 4
- SMCZ 2
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- SMCZ 1.96M sh
- AAPD $9.86
- SMCZ $5.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | SMCZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F9 |
| Mission | A85 | A89Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | D38 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and SMCZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
SMCZD
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
SMCZ Defiance's double-strength bear on Super Micro. SMCZ uses swaps to target -200% of SMCI's move each trading day, resetting daily: a trader's tool for taking the short side of the AI server trade without a margin account.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
SMCZ The Fund seeks daily inverse results equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage move in Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s common stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs SMCZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs SMCZ Cost
Overpaying SMCZ vs AAPD
$8,953
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
SMCZ 1.55%
$26,987
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | SMCZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $2,671 | $976 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $9,795 | $3,412 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $26,987 | $8,953 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.55%SMCZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
SMCZ 38th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs SMCZ Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%
- SMCZ
- AAPD $0.45
- SMCZ
- AAPD $0.18
- SMCZ $2.36
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- SMCZ Dec 30, 2025
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- SMCZ Dec 31, 2025
- AAPD Quarterly
- SMCZ Irregular
Distribution history
AAPD vs SMCZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%SMCZ 164.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32SMCZ −0.61
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%SMCZ −99.0%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84SMCZ −7.25
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.55% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.55% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.55% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.