TSDD ranks 2nd and SMCZ 37th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
SMCZ vs TSDD
TSDD −0.57pt a year
1.55%0.98%
TSDD 5.6×the volume
1.96M11M
SMCZ vs TSDD Performance
−86.9%−24.7%
- SMCZ 1.55%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- SMCZ $2M
- TSDD $31M
- SMCZ −86.9%
- TSDD −24.7%, better
- SMCZ
- TSDD 10.55%
- SMCZ 2
- TSDD 1
- SMCZ 1.96M sh
- TSDD 11M sh, better
- SMCZ $5.99
- TSDD $6.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SMCZ | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F9 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A98Higher |
| Risk | D28 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | F23 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. SMCZ and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SMCZD
TSDDA
In short
SMCZ Defiance's double-strength bear on Super Micro. SMCZ uses swaps to target -200% of SMCI's move each trading day, resetting daily: a trader's tool for taking the short side of the AI server trade without a margin account.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
SMCZ The Fund seeks daily inverse results equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage move in Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s common stock.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SMCZ vs TSDD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SMCZ vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying SMCZ vs TSDD
$8,625
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SMCZ 1.55%
$26,987
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SMCZ | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,671 | $1,729 | $942 |
| 20 | $9,795 | $6,504 | $3,291 |
| 30 | $26,987 | $18,362 | $8,625 |
- 1.55%SMCZ
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
SMCZ 38th cheapest of 43 funds
SMCZ vs TSDD Dividends
- SMCZ
- TSDD 10.55%
- SMCZ
- TSDD $0.65
- SMCZ $2.36
- TSDD $0.65
- SMCZ Dec 30, 2025
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- SMCZ Dec 31, 2025
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- SMCZ Irregular
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
SMCZ vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SMCZ 164.0%TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SMCZ −0.61TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- SMCZ −99.0%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SMCZ −7.25TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 1.55% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.55% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.55% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.