AAPD ranks 1st and SMST 19th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs SMST
AAPD −0.42pt a year
0.96%1.38%
AAPD 9.0×the volume
8.8M984K
AAPD vs SMST Performance
−20.1%−57.2%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- SMST 1.38%
- AAPD $35M
- SMST $8M
- AAPD −20.1%, better
- SMST −57.2%
- AAPD 4.43%
- SMST
- AAPD 5
- SMST 2
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- SMST 984K sh
- AAPD $9.98
- SMST $15.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | SMST |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | C46 |
| Mission | A85 | A97Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A79Higher | C52 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and SMST are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
SMSTB
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
SMST The first US ETF built to short MicroStrategy (now Strategy), launched in 2024 and moved from -1.5x to -2x within weeks. It aims for twice the inverse of MSTR's daily move, one day at a time, at 1.38% a year with no fee waiver.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
SMST The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to negative two times the daily percentage change in MicroStrategy Incorporated's share price.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs SMST Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs SMST Cost
Overpaying SMST vs AAPD
$6,520
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
SMST 1.38%
$24,554
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | SMST | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $2,395 | $700 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $8,848 | $2,465 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $24,554 | $6,520 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.38%SMST
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
SMST 29th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs SMST Dividends
- AAPD 4.43%
- SMST
- AAPD $0.45
- SMST None
- AAPD $0.18
- SMST
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- SMST
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- SMST
- AAPD Quarterly
- SMST
Distribution history
AAPD vs SMST Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%SMST 180.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32SMST −0.32
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%SMST −99.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84SMST −3.50
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.38% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.38% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.38% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.