AAPD ranks 1st and TSMZ 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs TSMZ
AAPD −0.05pt a year
0.96%1.01%
AAPD 84.6×the volume
8.8M104K
AAPD vs TSMZ Performance
−21.5%−33.5%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- TSMZ 1.01%
- AAPD $24M
- TSMZ $3M
- AAPD −21.5%, better
- TSMZ −33.5%
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- TSMZ 3.95%
- AAPD 4
- TSMZ 3
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- TSMZ 104K sh
- AAPD $9.86
- TSMZ $7.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | TSMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A85 | A96Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | C51 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and TSMZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
TSMZC
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
TSMZ A one-to-one short on the world's biggest chip foundry. TSMZ aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top, at 1.01% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
TSMZ The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd common shares, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs TSMZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs TSMZ Cost
Overpaying TSMZ vs AAPD
$816
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
TSMZ 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | TSMZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,780 | $85 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,686 | $303 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $18,850 | $816 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.01%TSMZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
TSMZ 10th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs TSMZ Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- TSMZ 3.95%
- AAPD $0.45
- TSMZ $0.32
- AAPD $0.18
- TSMZ $0.07
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- TSMZ Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- TSMZ Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- TSMZ Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs TSMZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%TSMZ 34.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32TSMZ −1.35
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%TSMZ −75.1%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84TSMZ −1.25
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.