TSDD ranks 2nd and TSMZ 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
TSDD vs TSMZ
0.0%by weight
TSDD −0.03pt a year
0.98%1.01%
TSDD 105.7×the volume
11M104K
TSDD vs TSMZ Performance
−24.7%−33.5%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- TSMZ 1.01%
- TSDD $31M
- TSMZ $3M
- TSDD −24.7%, better
- TSMZ −33.5%
- TSDD 10.55%, better
- TSMZ 3.95%
- TSDD 1
- TSMZ 3
- TSDD 11M sh, better
- TSMZ 104K sh
- TSDD $6.07
- TSMZ $7.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TSDD | TSMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A96 |
| Risk | C49 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | A81Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A72Higher | C51 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. TSDD and TSMZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TSDDA
TSMZC
In short
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
TSMZ A one-to-one short on the world's biggest chip foundry. TSMZ aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top, at 1.01% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
TSMZ The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd common shares, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TSDD vs TSMZ Holdings
How TSDD and TSMZ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of TSDD and 0.0% of TSMZ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TSMZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for TSMZ.
Concentration
- TSDD199.9%
- TSMZ1268.6%
- TSDD1
- TSMZ1
Asset class
- TSDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSMZ
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in TSDD1
- In both0
- Only in TSMZ1
Only in TSDD
1 security, 100% of TSDD by weight
- Tsla199.89%
Only in TSMZ
1 security, 100% of TSMZ by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 506224.29%
Weight gaps
TSDD and TSMZ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TSDD vs TSMZ Cost
Overpaying TSMZ vs TSDD
$488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
TSMZ 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TSDD | TSMZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $1,780 | $51 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $6,686 | $182 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $18,850 | $488 |
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- 1.01%TSMZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
TSMZ 10th cheapest of 43 funds
TSDD vs TSMZ Dividends
- TSDD 10.55%, better
- TSMZ 3.95%
- TSDD $0.65
- TSMZ $0.32
- TSDD $0.65
- TSMZ $0.07
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- TSMZ Sep 22, 2026
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- TSMZ Sep 29, 2026
- TSDD Irregular
- TSMZ Quarterly
Distribution history
TSDD vs TSMZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TSDD 100.6%TSMZ 34.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- TSDD −0.87TSMZ −1.35
- Worst fall
- TSDD −99.1%TSMZ −75.1%
- Market sensitivity
- TSDD −2.40TSMZ −1.25
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.