AAPW ranks 1st and AMDW 2nd of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
AAPW vs AMDW
80.3%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
1.00%1.00%
AMDW 6.6×the volume
14K92.8K
AAPW vs AMDW Performance
+28.3%+104.1%
- AAPW 1.00%
- AMDW 1.00%
- AAPW $44M
- AMDW $131M
- AAPW +28.3%
- AMDW +104.1%, better
- AAPW 26.59%
- AMDW 62.06%, better
- AAPW 5
- AMDW 5
- AAPW 14K sh
- AMDW 92.8K sh, better
- AAPW $41.43
- AMDW $77.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPW | AMDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | A88 | A97Higher |
| Risk | A84Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | C45 | C50Higher |
| Durability | B66 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. AAPW and AMDW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPWB
AMDWB
In short
AAPW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. AAPW resets on the calendar week, targeting 1.2x Apple's weekly total return before fees, and cuts a distribution check every week. Cost: 1.00%, no waiver.
AMDW An AMD income play that never sells a call. AMDW holds swaps plus stock targeting 1.2 times AMD's calendar-week total return, upside uncapped, and is built to pay out every week. Fee: 1.00%.
Stated mandate
AAPW AAPW seeks income and growth by making weekly distributions while targeting 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Apple common shares, before fees and expenses.
AMDW The Fund seeks weekly distributions and aims to deliver 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPW vs AMDW Holdings
How AAPW and AMDW differ
80.3%
Shared holdings make up 100% of AMDW and 80.7% of AAPW.
Level by level
- Holdings80.3%
Sector
No Sector split for AAPW and AMDW.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AAPWMore in AMDW | AAPW | AMDW |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- AAPW200.7%
- AMDW220.8%
- AAPW3
- AMDW3
Asset class
- AAPW
- Equity
- AMDW
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AAPW1
- In both2
- Only in AMDW1
Only in AAPW
1 security, 5.7% of AAPW by weight
- Apple Inc5.68%
Only in AMDW
1 security, 17.4% of AMDW by weight
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc17.38%
Weight gaps
All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in AAPWMore in AMDW | AAPW | AMDW |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States Treasury Bill 12/03/2026 | AMDW +20.78 points | 67.62% | 88.40% |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | AAPW +0.36 points | 13.05% | 12.69% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPW vs AMDW Cost
Same expense ratio
$18,688
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPW 1.00%
$18,688
AMDW 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPW | AMDW |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,763 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,625 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,688 |
- 1.00%AAPW
- 1.00%AMDW
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
AAPW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AMDW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW vs AMDW Dividends
- AAPW 26.59%
- AMDW 62.06%, better
- AAPW $11.02
- AMDW $47.92
- AAPW $0.24
- AMDW $0.29
- AAPW Oct 26, 2026
- AMDW Oct 26, 2026
- AAPW Oct 27, 2026
- AMDW Oct 27, 2026
- AAPW Weekly
- AMDW Weekly
Distribution history
AAPW vs AMDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPW 27.1%AMDW 123.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPW 0.76AMDW 1.18
- Worst fall
- AAPW −36.3%AMDW −34.8%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPW 1.02AMDW 6.34
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.