AAPW ranks 1st and AMZW 7th of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
AAPW vs AMZW
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
1.00%1.00%
AMZW 1.1×the volume
14.7K16.9K
AAPW vs AMZW Performance
+32.5%+5.9%
- AAPW 1.00%
- AMZW 1.00%
- AAPW $44M
- AMZW $36M
- AAPW +32.5%, better
- AMZW +5.9%
- AAPW 26.76%
- AMZW 39.77%, better
- AAPW 5
- AMZW 4
- AAPW 14.7K sh
- AMZW 16.9K sh, better
- AAPW $40.84
- AMZW $34.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPW | AMZW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | A93Higher | B63 |
| Risk | A84Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | C46 | B62Higher |
| Durability | B66 | B68Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. AAPW and AMZW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPWB
AMZWB
In short
AAPW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. AAPW resets on the calendar week, targeting 1.2x Apple's weekly total return before fees, and cuts a distribution check every week. Cost: 1.00%, no waiver.
AMZW A weekly paycheck stapled to Amazon. AMZW's stated aim is to pay distributions every week while targeting 1.2 times AMZN's calendar-week total return before fees and expenses. Fee: 1.00%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
AAPW AAPW seeks income and growth by making weekly distributions while targeting 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Apple common shares, before fees and expenses.
AMZW The Fund primarily seeks to pay weekly distributions and secondarily targets approximately 1.2 times Amazon’s calendar-week total return, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPW vs AMZW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPW vs AMZW Cost
Same expense ratio
$18,688
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPW 1.00%
$18,688
AMZW 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPW | AMZW |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,763 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,625 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,688 |
- 1.00%AAPW
- 1.00%AMZW
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
AAPW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AMZW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW vs AMZW Dividends
- AAPW 26.76%
- AMZW 39.77%, better
- AAPW $11.19
- AMZW $14.24
- AAPW $0.20
- AMZW $0.16
- AAPW Nov 9, 2026
- AMZW Nov 9, 2026
- AAPW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- AMZW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- AAPW Weekly
- AMZW Weekly
Distribution history
AAPW vs AMZW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPW 27.1%AMZW 41.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPW 0.76AMZW 0.16
- Worst fall
- AAPW −36.3%AMZW −26.8%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPW 0.98AMZW 2.20
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.