AAPY ranks 4th and BABO 13th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
AAPY vs BABO
AAPY −0.01pt a year
0.99%1.00%
BABO 6.5×the volume
5.85K38.2K
AAPY vs BABO Performance
+28.3%−36.2%
- AAPY 0.99%, better
- BABO 1.00%
- AAPY $8M
- BABO $12M
- AAPY +28.3%, better
- BABO −36.2%
- AAPY 10.78%
- BABO 76.97%, better
- AAPY 6
- BABO 7
- AAPY 5.85K sh
- BABO 38.2K sh, better
- AAPY $28.39
- BABO $6.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPY | BABO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A77 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A70 |
| Risk | A77Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | D35 | |
| Durability | B56 | B56 |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. AAPY and BABO are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPYA
BABOB
In short
AAPY Apple income without slamming the brakes on upside: AAPY builds its Apple exposure with options, sells calls above the market rather than at it, and pays monthly. Fee is 0.99% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.15% gross).
BABO Alibaba, repackaged as a monthly paycheck. BABO sells weekly call spreads on BABA, trading away part of the upside for option premium, then pays cash out monthly.
Stated mandate
AAPY The Fund seeks current income while providing exposure to Apple Inc.'s share price, with potential gains limited by its options strategy.
BABO BABO is actively managed to generate weekly income by selling call spreads on Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA).
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPY vs BABO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPY vs BABO Cost
Overpaying BABO vs AAPY
$163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPY 0.99%
$18,525
BABO 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPY | BABO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,763 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $6,625 | $60 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $18,688 | $163 |
- 0.99%AAPY, cheaper
- 1.00%BABO
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
AAPY 9th cheapest of 71 funds
BABO 20th cheapest of 71 funds
AAPY vs BABO Dividends
- AAPY 10.78%
- BABO 76.97%, better
- AAPY $3.05
- BABO $4.85
- AAPY $0.25
- BABO $0.04
- AAPY Oct 21, 2026
- BABO Oct 29, 2026
- AAPY Oct 22, 2026
- BABO Oct 30, 2026
- AAPY Monthly
- BABO Weekly
Distribution history
AAPY vs BABO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPY 18.4%BABO 40.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPY 0.84BABO 0.11
- Worst fall
- AAPY −29.2%BABO −42.3%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPY 0.75BABO 0.50
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.