KWIN ranks 1st and BABO 13th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
BABO vs KWIN
KWIN −0.49pt a year
1.00%0.51%
BABO 2.7×the volume
38.2K14K
BABO vs KWIN Performance
−30.1%+2.9%
- BABO 1.00%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- BABO $12M
- KWIN $63M
- BABO −36.2%
- KWIN
- BABO 76.97%
- KWIN
- BABO 7
- KWIN 55
- BABO 38.2K sh, better
- KWIN 14K sh
- BABO $6.31
- KWIN $25.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BABO | KWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | D37 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | B56 | B68Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. BABO and KWIN are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BABOB
KWINA
In short
BABO Alibaba, repackaged as a monthly paycheck. BABO sells weekly call spreads on BABA, trading away part of the upside for option premium, then pays cash out monthly.
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
Stated mandate
BABO BABO is actively managed to generate weekly income by selling call spreads on Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA).
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BABO vs KWIN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BABO vs KWIN Cost
Overpaying BABO vs KWIN
$8,523
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BABO 1.00%
$18,688
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BABO | KWIN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $918 | $845 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $3,527 | $3,098 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $10,165 | $8,523 |
- 1.00%BABO
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
BABO 20th cheapest of 71 funds
BABO vs KWIN Dividends
- BABO 76.97%
- KWIN
- BABO $4.85
- KWIN None
- BABO $0.04
- KWIN
- BABO Oct 29, 2026
- KWIN
- BABO Oct 30, 2026
- KWIN
- BABO Weekly
- KWIN
Distribution history
BABO vs KWIN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BABO 40.7%KWIN
- Return per unit of risk
- BABO 0.11KWIN
- Worst fall
- BABO −42.3%KWIN
- Market sensitivity
- BABO 0.50KWIN 0.001
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.