AAPY ranks 4th and MARO 21st of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
AAPY vs MARO
AAPY −0.01pt a year
0.99%1.00%
MARO 94.5×the volume
5.85K552K
AAPY vs MARO Performance
+28.3%−66.2%
- AAPY 0.99%, better
- MARO 1.00%
- AAPY $8M
- MARO $28M
- AAPY +28.3%, better
- MARO −66.2%
- AAPY 10.78%
- MARO 251.61%, better
- AAPY 6
- MARO 7
- AAPY 5.85K sh
- MARO 552K sh, better
- AAPY $28.39
- MARO $2.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPY | MARO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A77 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B66 |
| Risk | A77Higher | F11 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | D35 | |
| Durability | B56 | A70Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. AAPY and MARO are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPYA
MAROB
In short
AAPY Apple income without slamming the brakes on upside: AAPY builds its Apple exposure with options, sells calls above the market rather than at it, and pays monthly. Fee is 0.99% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.15% gross).
MARO Income squeezed out of a bitcoin miner that trades like one. Launched in December 2024, MARO sells call spreads on MARA rather than plain covered calls, so the upside it gives away is a band, not everything above one strike.
Stated mandate
AAPY The Fund seeks current income while providing exposure to Apple Inc.'s share price, with potential gains limited by its options strategy.
MARO The fund seeks weekly income by actively selling call spreads on MARA while retaining participation in MARA share-price appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPY vs MARO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPY vs MARO Cost
Overpaying MARO vs AAPY
$163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPY 0.99%
$18,525
MARO 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPY | MARO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,763 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $6,625 | $60 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $18,688 | $163 |
- 0.99%AAPY, cheaper
- 1.00%MARO
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
AAPY 9th cheapest of 71 funds
MARO 20th cheapest of 71 funds
AAPY vs MARO Dividends
- AAPY 10.78%
- MARO 251.61%, better
- AAPY $3.05
- MARO $5.71
- AAPY $0.25
- MARO $0.03
- AAPY Oct 21, 2026
- MARO Oct 29, 2026
- AAPY Oct 22, 2026
- MARO Oct 30, 2026
- AAPY Monthly
- MARO Weekly
Distribution history
AAPY vs MARO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPY 18.4%MARO 55.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPY 0.84MARO −0.86
- Worst fall
- AAPY −29.2%MARO −76.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPY 0.75MARO 2.43
AAPY and MARO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
