KWIN ranks 1st and MARO 21st of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
KWIN vs MARO
KWIN −0.49pt a year
0.51%1.00%
MARO 39.6×the volume
14K552K
KWIN vs MARO Performance
+2.9%−37.9%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- MARO 1.00%
- KWIN $63M
- MARO $28M
- KWIN
- MARO −66.2%
- KWIN
- MARO 251.61%
- KWIN 55
- MARO 7
- KWIN 14K sh
- MARO 552K sh, better
- KWIN $25.90
- MARO $2.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KWIN | MARO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A77 |
| Mission | B66 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | F11 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | B68 | A70Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. KWIN and MARO are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KWINA
MAROB
In short
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
MARO Income squeezed out of a bitcoin miner that trades like one. Launched in December 2024, MARO sells call spreads on MARA rather than plain covered calls, so the upside it gives away is a band, not everything above one strike.
Stated mandate
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
MARO The fund seeks weekly income by actively selling call spreads on MARA while retaining participation in MARA share-price appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KWIN vs MARO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KWIN vs MARO Cost
Overpaying MARO vs KWIN
$8,523
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
MARO 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KWIN | MARO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $1,763 | $845 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $6,625 | $3,098 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $18,688 | $8,523 |
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- 1.00%MARO
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
MARO 20th cheapest of 71 funds
KWIN vs MARO Dividends
- KWIN
- MARO 251.61%
- KWIN None
- MARO $5.71
- KWIN
- MARO $0.03
- KWIN
- MARO Oct 29, 2026
- KWIN
- MARO Oct 30, 2026
- KWIN
- MARO Weekly
Distribution history
KWIN vs MARO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KWIN MARO 55.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- KWIN MARO −0.86
- Worst fall
- KWIN MARO −76.4%
- Market sensitivity
- KWIN 0.001MARO 2.43
KWIN and MARO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
