AAPY ranks 4th and XOMO 30th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
AAPY vs XOMO
AAPY −0.18pt a year
0.99%1.17%
XOMO 9.4×the volume
5.85K55.1K
AAPY +5.7pt
+18.3%+12.6%
AAPY vs XOMO Performance
+26.4%+37.1%
- AAPY 0.99%, better
- XOMO 1.17%
- AAPY $8M
- XOMO $41M
- AAPY +26.4%
- XOMO +37.1%, better
- AAPY 10.94%
- XOMO 36.24%, better
- AAPY 6
- XOMO 9
- AAPY 5.85K sh
- XOMO 55.1K sh, better
- AAPY $28.39
- XOMO $11.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPY | XOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77Higher | D35 |
| Mission | A100Higher | C50 |
| Risk | A77 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | D35 | |
| Durability | B55 | A79Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. AAPY and XOMO are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPYA
XOMOC
In short
AAPY Apple income without slamming the brakes on upside: AAPY builds its Apple exposure with options, sells calls above the market rather than at it, and pays monthly. Fee is 0.99% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.15% gross).
XOMO XOMO points YieldMax's premium-harvesting machinery at an oil major, selling call spreads on Exxon Mobil rather than plain covered calls, aiming to bank option income while leaving room to ride part of XOM's move higher.
Stated mandate
AAPY The Fund seeks current income while providing exposure to Apple Inc.'s share price, with potential gains limited by its options strategy.
XOMO The fund is actively managed to generate weekly income by selling call spreads on Exxon Mobil Corp. It seeks to harvest option premiums while retaining some participation in Exxon Mobil's share-price appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPY vs XOMO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPY vs XOMO Cost
Overpaying XOMO vs AAPY
$2,863
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPY 0.99%
$18,525
XOMO 1.17%
$21,388
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPY | XOMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $2,048 | $302 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $7,639 | $1,074 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $21,388 | $2,863 |
- 0.99%AAPY, cheaper
- 1.17%XOMO
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
AAPY 9th cheapest of 71 funds
XOMO 46th cheapest of 71 funds
AAPY vs XOMO Dividends
- AAPY 10.94%
- XOMO 36.24%, better
- AAPY $3.05
- XOMO $4.10
- AAPY $0.25
- XOMO $0.09
- AAPY Oct 21, 2026
- XOMO Oct 29, 2026
- AAPY Oct 22, 2026
- XOMO Oct 30, 2026
- AAPY Monthly
- XOMO Weekly
Distribution history
AAPY vs XOMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPY 18.4%XOMO 17.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPY 0.84, betterXOMO 0.63
- Worst fall
- AAPY −29.2%XOMO −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPY 0.75XOMO −0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.