KWIN ranks 1st and XOMO 30th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
KWIN vs XOMO
KWIN −0.66pt a year
0.51%1.17%
XOMO 3.9×the volume
14K55.1K
KWIN vs XOMO Performance
+2.7%+31.2%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- XOMO 1.17%
- KWIN $63M
- XOMO $41M
- KWIN
- XOMO +37.1%
- KWIN
- XOMO 36.24%
- KWIN 55
- XOMO 9
- KWIN 14K sh
- XOMO 55.1K sh, better
- KWIN $25.90
- XOMO $11.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KWIN | XOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D35 |
| Mission | C50 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | A83 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A89 | |
| Durability | B68 | A79Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. KWIN and XOMO are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KWINA
XOMOC
In short
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
XOMO XOMO points YieldMax's premium-harvesting machinery at an oil major, selling call spreads on Exxon Mobil rather than plain covered calls, aiming to bank option income while leaving room to ride part of XOM's move higher.
Stated mandate
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
XOMO The fund is actively managed to generate weekly income by selling call spreads on Exxon Mobil Corp. It seeks to harvest option premiums while retaining some participation in Exxon Mobil's share-price appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KWIN vs XOMO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KWIN vs XOMO Cost
Overpaying XOMO vs KWIN
$11,223
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
XOMO 1.17%
$21,388
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KWIN | XOMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $2,048 | $1,130 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $7,639 | $4,112 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $21,388 | $11,223 |
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- 1.17%XOMO
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
XOMO 46th cheapest of 71 funds
KWIN vs XOMO Dividends
- KWIN
- XOMO 36.24%
- KWIN None
- XOMO $4.10
- KWIN
- XOMO $0.09
- KWIN
- XOMO Oct 29, 2026
- KWIN
- XOMO Oct 30, 2026
- KWIN
- XOMO Weekly
Distribution history
KWIN vs XOMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KWIN XOMO 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- KWIN XOMO 0.63
- Worst fall
- KWIN XOMO −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- KWIN 0.001XOMO −0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.