Skip to content

ABIG vs QIDX

Argent Large Cap ETF

ABIGBNasdaq

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

QIDXBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ABIG −0.01pt a year

ABIG0.49%QIDX0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

QIDX 1.1×the volume

ABIG3.49KQIDX3.94K

ABIG vs QIDX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.0%ABIG+8.2%QIDX

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ABIG +7.0%. QIDX +8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ABIG 0.49%, better
QIDX 0.50%
Fund size
ABIG $60M
QIDX $39M
1Y total return
ABIG +7.0%
QIDX +8.2%, better
Yield (12M)
ABIG No data
QIDX 0.92%
Holdings
ABIG 30
QIDX 130
Avg volume (30D)
ABIG 3.49K sh
QIDX 3.94K sh, better
NAV per share
ABIG $34.31
QIDX $11.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ABIG: Cost 75, Risk 35, Mission 69, Tradability 54, Holdings 40, Durability 54. QIDX: Cost 75, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 23, Holdings 93, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for ABIG, QIDX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarABIGQIDX
Cost30% weightA75A75
Mission25% weightB69Not scored
Risk15% weightD35A76Higher
Tradability15% weightC54HigherF23
Holdings10% weightC40A93Higher
Durability5% weightC54HigherC45

Rank among US Active Quality funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ABIG and QIDX are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Quality⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

QIDX ranks 4th and ABIG 6th of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.

  1. Rank 1ANPFENpf Core Equity EtfScore 79
  2. Rank 2AQLTYGMO US Quality ETFScore 75
  3. Rank 3BAQECAQE Core ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BQIDXIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 5BQFFQualivian Focus Fund ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 6BABIGArgent Large Cap ETFScore 56
  7. Rank 7CJGRWJensen Quality Growth ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ABIGBArgent Large Cap ETF

QIDXBIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

In short

ABIG Argent's 2025 ETF debut: an active large-cap portfolio built around businesses the manager judges durable, screened on growth, quality and value, at a fee under the typical active quality fund.

QIDX An active quality fund stitched from Indexperts' own house indexes: steady-earnings names across large, mid and small caps, with a manager free to override the rules. It charges less than the typical fund in its peer group.

Stated mandate

ABIG The actively managed fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in equity securities of large-capitalization companies that the sub-adviser considers high-quality, enduring businesses.

QIDX The Fund seeks total return.

Why people hold it

  • ABIG Costs 0.49% a year, below the 0.57% median for its active quality large-cap peer group and level with the cheapest top-rated fund in that group (ABFL).
  • No index to hug. A sub-adviser runs a proprietary quantitative screen across growth, quality and value, then holds large caps it considers enduring businesses.
  • The portfolio does what the prospectus advertises: US large caps, quality tilt, no style drift into small caps or foreign names.
  • Sits in the upper half of its quality and free-cash-flow peer cohort despite being the newest name in the room.
  • QIDX Charges 0.50% a year, below the median for its quality-focused peer group and about half what the priciest name in that group (EQTY, 0.99%) asks.
  • Rules first, judgment second: the portfolio is drawn from Indexperts' own growth and consistent-value indexes, with the advisor free to trim or exclude.sec.gov
  • Reaches across large, mid and small caps instead of hugging a handful of mega caps, and the portfolio build ranks among the stronger ones in its peer group.sec.gov
  • A plain 1940 Act equity fund seeking total return, with cash paid out quarterly. No leverage, no options overlay, no derivatives wrapper to decode.

Worth knowing

  • ABIG Launched in April 2025, so the track record is short and risk measures rest on limited history.
  • Small asset base and thin trading, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads than the established funds in this lane.
  • Index-based quality exposure runs far cheaper (PSET charges 0.15%), so the fee here is the price of a human making the calls.
  • QIDX Listed at the end of 2024, so the track record is short and any read on its risk profile rests on limited history.
  • Small and thinly traded: spreads can run wider than on giant index funds, and size of order matters more.
  • You are paying 0.50% for a manager's judgment when index-built quality rivals like PSET run 0.15%.

Full ABIG profile⁠

Full QIDX profile⁠

ABIG vs QIDX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ABIG vs QIDX Cost

Overpaying QIDX vs ABIG

$187

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ABIG 0.49%

    $9,792

  • QIDX 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ABIG 0.49%
  • QIDX 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530QIDX $9,979ABIG $9,792

Year by year

YearABIGQIDXOverpaying
10$883$900$17
20$3,394$3,460$66
30$9,792$9,979$187

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%ABIG, cheaper
  • 0.50%QIDX
  • Middle half of US Active Quality funds
  • Median 0.65%

ABIG 2nd cheapest of 16 funds

QIDX 4th cheapest of 16 funds

ABIG vs QIDX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ABIG No data
QIDX 0.92%
Payout (12M)
ABIG No data
QIDX $0.11
Last payment
ABIG $0.03
QIDX $0.03
Ex-dividend
ABIG Dec 23, 2025
QIDX Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
ABIG Dec 24, 2025
QIDX Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
ABIG Irregular
QIDX Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ABIGIrregular · 1 paymentAll ABIG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.032026YTD
QIDXQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll QIDX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 28, 2025 $0.02; Jun 27, 2025 $0.02; Sep 29, 2025 $0.02; Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Mar 30, 2026 $0.03; Jun 29, 2026 $0.03; Sep 29, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.032026YTD

ABIG vs QIDX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ABIG 12.8%since May 2025QIDX 9.9%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ABIG 0.86since May 2025QIDX 0.25since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ABIG −13.7%since Apr 2025QIDX −15.0%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ABIG 1.06QIDX 0.57

Popular comparisons

  • ABIGBvsNPFEA

    Argent Large Cap ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsNPFEA

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ABIGBvsQLTYA

    Argent Large Cap ETF · GMO US Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsQLTYA

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · GMO US Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ABIGBvsAQECB

    Argent Large Cap ETF · AQE Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsAQECB

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · AQE Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.