Skip to content

AQEC vs QIDX

AQE Core ETF

AQECBCboe

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

QIDXBNYSE Arca

Overlap

16.6%by weight

Expense ratio

AQEC −0.01pt a year

AQEC0.49%QIDX0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

AQEC 6.3×the volume

AQEC24.8KQIDX3.94K

AQEC vs QIDX Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.2%AQEC+8.0%QIDX

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AQEC +1.2%. QIDX +8.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%5%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AQEC 0.49%, better
QIDX 0.50%
Fund size
AQEC $602M
QIDX $39M
1Y total return
AQEC No data
QIDX +8.2%
Yield (12M)
AQEC No data
QIDX 0.92%
Holdings
AQEC 134
QIDX 130
Avg volume (30D)
AQEC 24.8K sh, better
QIDX 3.94K sh
NAV per share
AQEC $25.92
QIDX $11.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AQEC: Cost 75, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 85, Durability 57. QIDX: Cost 75, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 23, Holdings 93, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for AQEC, QIDX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAQECQIDX
Cost30% weightA75A75
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC40A76Higher
Tradability15% weightB67HigherF23
Holdings10% weightA85A93Higher
Durability5% weightB57HigherC45

Rank among US Active Quality funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AQEC and QIDX are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Quality⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

AQEC ranks 3rd and QIDX 4th of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.

  1. Rank 1ANPFENpf Core Equity EtfScore 79
  2. Rank 2AQLTYGMO US Quality ETFScore 75
  3. Rank 3BAQECAQE Core ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BQIDXIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 5BQFFQualivian Focus Fund ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AQECBAQE Core ETF

QIDXBIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

In short

AQEC No data

QIDX An active quality fund stitched from Indexperts' own house indexes: steady-earnings names across large, mid and small caps, with a manager free to override the rules. It charges less than the typical fund in its peer group.

Stated mandate

AQEC No data

QIDX The Fund seeks total return.

Why people hold it

AQEC No data

  • QIDX Charges 0.50% a year, below the median for its quality-focused peer group and about half what the priciest name in that group (EQTY, 0.99%) asks.
  • Rules first, judgment second: the portfolio is drawn from Indexperts' own growth and consistent-value indexes, with the advisor free to trim or exclude.sec.gov
  • Reaches across large, mid and small caps instead of hugging a handful of mega caps, and the portfolio build ranks among the stronger ones in its peer group.sec.gov
  • A plain 1940 Act equity fund seeking total return, with cash paid out quarterly. No leverage, no options overlay, no derivatives wrapper to decode.

Worth knowing

AQEC No data

  • QIDX Listed at the end of 2024, so the track record is short and any read on its risk profile rests on limited history.
  • Small and thinly traded: spreads can run wider than on giant index funds, and size of order matters more.
  • You are paying 0.50% for a manager's judgment when index-built quality rivals like PSET run 0.15%.

Full AQEC profile⁠

Full QIDX profile⁠

AQEC vs QIDX Holdings

How AQEC and QIDX differ

Overlap by weight

16.6%

Shared holdings make up 32.3% of QIDX and 28.5% of AQEC.

Level by level

  • Holdings24 in both16.6%
  • Countryby domicile92.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for QIDX.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AQEC and QIDX, widest gap first
CountryMore in AQECMore in QIDX
United StatesQIDX +6.8 points
United KingdomAQEC +4.2 points
SwitzerlandAQEC +1.6 points
NetherlandsAQEC +1.5 points
SingaporeQIDX +0.6 points
DenmarkAQEC +0.6 points
SwedenQIDX +0.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AQEC36.2%
  • QIDX25.3%

Securities held

  • AQEC133
  • QIDX129

Asset class

AQEC
Equity
QIDX
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in AQEC109
  • In both24
  • Only in QIDX105

Only in AQEC

109 securities, 71.3% of AQEC by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp7.25%
  • Amazon.com Inc3.07%
  • Broadcom Inc2.06%

Only in QIDX

105 securities, 65.2% of QIDX by weight

  • Arista Networks, Inc.3.68%
  • HEICO Corporation2.44%
  • Williams Co INC1.86%

Weight gaps

All 24 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in AQEC and QIDX, widest gap first
HoldingMore in AQECMore in QIDX
Microsoft CorpMSFTAQEC +5.31 points
Apple IncAAPLAQEC +5.28 points
Thermo Fisher Scientific IncTMOQIDX +3.10 points
Altria Group IncMOQIDX +1.72 points
ExxonMobil Holdings CorpXOMQIDX +1.43 points
Cisco Systems IncCSCOQIDX +1.24 points
Verizon Communications IncVZQIDX +1.22 points
Walmart IncWMTQIDX +1.12 points

All 134 AQEC holdings⁠All 130 QIDX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AQEC vs QIDX Cost

Overpaying QIDX vs AQEC

$187

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AQEC 0.49%

    $9,792

  • QIDX 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AQEC 0.49%
  • QIDX 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530QIDX $9,979AQEC $9,792

Year by year

YearAQECQIDXOverpaying
10$883$900$17
20$3,394$3,460$66
30$9,792$9,979$187

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%AQEC, cheaper
  • 0.50%QIDX
  • Middle half of US Active Quality funds
  • Median 0.65%

AQEC 2nd cheapest of 16 funds

QIDX 4th cheapest of 16 funds

AQEC vs QIDX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AQEC No data
QIDX 0.92%
Payout (12M)
AQEC No data
QIDX $0.11
Last payment
AQEC $0.05
QIDX $0.03
Ex-dividend
AQEC Sep 23, 2026
QIDX Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
AQEC Sep 24, 2026
QIDX Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
AQEC Quarterly
QIDX Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

AQECQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll AQEC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Mar 25, 2026 $0.10; Jun 24, 2026 $0.10; Sep 23, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
QIDXQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll QIDX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 28, 2025 $0.02; Jun 27, 2025 $0.02; Sep 29, 2025 $0.02; Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Mar 30, 2026 $0.03; Jun 29, 2026 $0.03; Sep 29, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD

AQEC vs QIDX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AQEC No dataQIDX 9.9%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AQEC No dataQIDX 0.25since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AQEC No dataQIDX −15.0%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AQEC 0.51QIDX 0.57

Popular comparisons

  • AQECBvsNPFEA

    AQE Core ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsNPFEA

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AQECBvsQLTYA

    AQE Core ETF · GMO US Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsQLTYA

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · GMO US Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AQECBvsQFFB

    AQE Core ETF · Qualivian Focus Fund ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsQFFB

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · Qualivian Focus Fund ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.