SCHZ ranks 2nd and ABXB 110th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
ABXB vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.59pt a year
0.62%0.03%
SCHZ 5718.7×the volume
4142.37M
ABXB +1.0pt
+0.8%−0.2%
ABXB vs SCHZ Performance
+4.1%−1.0%
- ABXB 0.62%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- ABXB $2M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- ABXB −0.5%
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- ABXB 4.82%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- ABXB 8
- SCHZ 12610
- ABXB 414 sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- ABXB $18.71
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ABXB | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F9 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B60Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | D28 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A78Higher |
| Durability | D35 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. ABXB and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ABXBD
SCHZA
In short
ABXB The agg-bond aisle is wall-to-wall index trackers. ABXB is the odd one out: a trend-following system that shifts the bond mix as momentum changes, with at least 80% kept in bonds, rebuilt from a former tactical high-yield fund.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
ABXB The Fund is being repositioned as a tactical intermediate core-plus bond strategy using a trend-following system. Its revised policy requires at least 80% of assets in bonds or instruments with similar economic characteristics.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ABXB vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ABXB vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying ABXB vs SCHZ
$11,541
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ABXB 0.62%
$12,179
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ABXB | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,111 | $55 | $1,056 |
| 20 | $4,246 | $216 | $4,030 |
| 30 | $12,179 | $638 | $11,541 |
- 0.62%ABXB
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
ABXB 104th cheapest of 114 funds
ABXB vs SCHZ Dividends
- ABXB 4.82%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- ABXB $0.90
- SCHZ $0.96
- ABXB $0.22
- SCHZ $0.08
- ABXB Sep 29, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- ABXB Sep 30, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- ABXB Quarterly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
ABXB vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ABXB
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ABXB 4.5%, betterSCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ABXB 0.38, betterSCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- ABXB −16.5%, betterSCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- ABXB 0.31SCHZ 0.99
ABXB and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.62% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
