SPGM ranks 2nd and ACWI 4th of 6 funds in the MSCI ACWI / World Category.
ACWI vs SPGM
SPGM −0.23pt a year
0.32%0.09%
ACWI 21.0×the volume
2.41M115K
ACWI +0.1pt
+12.5%+12.4%
ACWI vs SPGM Performance
+59.1%+60.9%
- ACWI 0.32%
- SPGM 0.09%, better
- ACWI $32.7B
- SPGM $1.8B
- ACWI +13.1%
- SPGM +13.9%, better
- ACWI 1.44%
- SPGM 1.81%, better
- ACWI 2220
- SPGM 2917
- ACWI 2.41M sh, better
- SPGM 115K sh
- ACWI $156.45
- SPGM $85.12
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACWI | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A73Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C51Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | C54 | A73Higher |
| Durability | B67Higher | C54 |
Rank among MSCI ACWI / World funds
Same Category. ACWI and SPGM are both graded against the same 6 MSCI ACWI / World funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACWIB
SPGMA
In short
ACWI ACWI borrows its name from the benchmark pros use as shorthand for "global stocks": large and mid caps across developed and emerging markets, roughly 2,200 of them, bought in one trade.
SPGM One ticker for the whole investable world. SPGM tracks MSCI's ACWI IMI index, holding roughly 2,900 stocks across developed and emerging markets, and charges 0.09% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
ACWI The fund seeks to track an index of large- and mid-cap equities across developed and emerging markets worldwide.
SPGM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the MSCI ACWI IMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACWI vs SPGM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACWI vs SPGM Cost
Overpaying ACWI vs SPGM
$4,644
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACWI 0.32%
$6,542
SPGM 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACWI | SPGM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $165 | $415 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $646 | $1,604 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $1,898 | $4,644 |
- 0.32%ACWI
- 0.09%SPGM, cheaper
- Middle half of MSCI ACWI / World funds
- Median 0.26%
SPGM 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
ACWI 4th cheapest of 6 funds
ACWI vs SPGM Dividends
- ACWI 1.44%
- SPGM 1.81%, better
- ACWI $2.25
- SPGM $1.54
- ACWI $1.01
- SPGM $0.67
- ACWI Jun 15, 2026
- SPGM Jun 1, 2026
- ACWI Jun 18, 2026
- SPGM Jun 5, 2026
- ACWI Twice a year
- SPGM Twice a year
Distribution history
ACWI vs SPGM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ACWI
- SPGM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACWI 11.4%, betterSPGM 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACWI 1.43SPGM 1.46, better
- Worst fall
- ACWI −26.4%SPGM −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ACWI 0.93SPGM 0.93Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
ACWI and SPGM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

