Skip to content
etf.net

ACYQ vs BABO

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

ACYQANYSE Arca

YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF

BABOBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ACYQ −0.25pt a year

ACYQ0.75%BABO1.00%

Avg volume · 30D

ACYQ 2.6×the volume

ACYQ98KBABO38.2K

ACYQ vs BABO Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026

+6.6%ACYQ−14.9%BABO

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026. ACYQ +6.6%. BABO −14.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%Jul 31Sep 14Oct 28
Expense ratio
ACYQ 0.75%, better
BABO 1.00%
Fund size
ACYQ $102M
BABO $12M
1Y total return
ACYQ No data
BABO −36.2%
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
BABO 76.97%
Holdings
ACYQ 7
BABO 7
Avg volume (30D)
ACYQ 98K sh, better
BABO 38.2K sh
NAV per share
ACYQ $20.20
BABO $6.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACYQ as of

ACYQ: Cost 99, Risk 96, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. BABO: Cost 77, Risk 37, Mission 70, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 56.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACYQ, BABO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACYQBABO
Cost30% weightA99HigherA77
Mission25% weightNot scoredA70
Risk15% weightA96HigherD37
Tradability15% weightB55HigherC48
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66HigherB56

Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACYQ and BABO are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Option Income⁠

Category · 71 funds
See all 71 ›

ACYQ ranks 2nd and BABO 13th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AKWINKraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AACYQFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 3AXXVSimplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETFScore 84
  4. Rank 13BAMZYYieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 13BBABOYieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 13BGOOPKurv Yield Premium Strategy Google (GOOGL) ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACYQAFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

BABOBYieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF

In short

ACYQ No data

BABO Alibaba, repackaged as a monthly paycheck. BABO sells weekly call spreads on BABA, trading away part of the upside for option premium, then pays cash out monthly.

Stated mandate

ACYQ No data

BABO BABO is actively managed to generate weekly income by selling call spreads on Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA).

Why people hold it

ACYQ No data

  • BABO It sells spreads, not naked calls: a long call sits above the short one, so the upside surrendered above that upper strike is defined rather than open-ended.yieldmaxetfs.com
  • Premium is written weekly, cash goes out monthly, and the book is actively managed rather than run off a fixed index formula.yieldmaxetfs.com
  • The fee is 1.00%, at the lower end of the single-stock income crowd and a shade under YieldMax siblings like TSMY and BRKC.
  • Inside a crowded field of single-stock option income funds, this is one of the stronger implementations of the idea.

Worth knowing

ACYQ No data

  • BABO Everything rides one stock: Alibaba. Premium cushions the ride, but a rough stretch in BABA still shows up here.
  • Exposure is synthetic, built from options on BABA rather than the shares, so there is no stock ownership, no underlying dividend, and roll mechanics matter.yieldmaxetfs.com
  • A smaller, lightly traded fund launched in 2024, so quoted spreads can run wider than the headline ETFs and the history to judge it by is short.

Full ACYQ profile⁠

Full BABO profile⁠

ACYQ vs BABO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACYQ vs BABO Cost

Overpaying BABO vs ACYQ

$4,206

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACYQ 0.75%

    $14,482

  • BABO 1.00%

    $18,688

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACYQ 0.75%
  • BABO 1.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BABO $18,688ACYQ $14,482

Year by year

YearACYQBABOOverpaying
10$1,336$1,763$427
20$5,078$6,625$1,547
30$14,482$18,688$4,206

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
  • 1.00%BABO
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
  • Median 1.04%

ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds

BABO 20th cheapest of 71 funds

ACYQ vs BABO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
BABO 76.97%
Payout (12M)
ACYQ No data
BABO $4.85
Last payment
ACYQ $0.39
BABO $0.04
Ex-dividend
ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
BABO Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
BABO Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
ACYQ Monthly
BABO Weekly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ACYQMonthly · 2 paymentsAll ACYQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.37; Oct 1, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
BABOWeekly · 44 paymentsAll BABO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 44 payments in 2026 YTD. Jan 2, 2026 $0.09; Jan 8, 2026 $0.12; Jan 15, 2026 $0.09; Jan 22, 2026 $0.13; Jan 29, 2026 $0.17; Feb 5, 2026 $0.12; Feb 12, 2026 $0.11; Feb 19, 2026 $0.10; Feb 26, 2026 $0.10; Mar 5, 2026 $0.09; Mar 12, 2026 $0.09; Mar 19, 2026 $0.09; Mar 26, 2026 $0.09; Apr 2, 2026 $0.09; Apr 9, 2026 $0.09; Apr 16, 2026 $0.09; Apr 23, 2026 $0.08; Apr 30, 2026 $0.10; May 7, 2026 $0.09; May 14, 2026 $0.10; May 21, 2026 $0.08; May 28, 2026 $0.09; Jun 4, 2026 $0.09; Jun 11, 2026 $0.08; Jun 18, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.07; Jul 2, 2026 $0.05; Jul 9, 2026 $0.06; Jul 16, 2026 $0.07; Jul 23, 2026 $0.08; Jul 30, 2026 $0.12; Aug 6, 2026 $0.16; Aug 13, 2026 $0.10; Aug 20, 2026 $0.08; Aug 27, 2026 $0.07; Sep 3, 2026 $0.06; Sep 10, 2026 $0.05; Sep 17, 2026 $0.06; Sep 24, 2026 $0.05; Oct 1, 2026 $0.05; Oct 8, 2026 $0.04; Oct 15, 2026 $0.05; Oct 22, 2026 $0.05; Oct 29, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

ACYQ vs BABO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACYQ No dataBABO 40.7%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACYQ No dataBABO 0.11since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACYQ No dataBABO −42.3%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACYQ 1.82BABO 0.50

ACYQ and BABO in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • ACYQAvsKWINA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BABOBvsKWINA

    YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACYQAvsXXVA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BABOBvsXXVA

    YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACYQAvsAAPYA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BABOBvsAAPYA

    YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.