Skip to content
etf.net

ACYQ vs MARO

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

ACYQANYSE Arca

YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF

MAROBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

ACYQ −0.25pt a year

ACYQ0.75%MARO1.00%

Avg volume · 30D

MARO 5.6×the volume

ACYQ98KMARO552K

ACYQ vs MARO Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026

+6.6%ACYQ−36.1%MARO

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026. ACYQ +6.6%. MARO −36.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Jul 31Sep 14Oct 28
Expense ratio
ACYQ 0.75%, better
MARO 1.00%
Fund size
ACYQ $102M
MARO $28M
1Y total return
ACYQ No data
MARO −66.2%
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
MARO 251.61%
Holdings
ACYQ 7
MARO 7
Avg volume (30D)
ACYQ 98K sh
MARO 552K sh, better
NAV per share
ACYQ $20.20
MARO $2.28
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACYQ as of

ACYQ: Cost 99, Risk 96, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. MARO: Cost 77, Risk 11, Mission 66, Tradability 49, Holdings not scored, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACYQ, MARO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACYQMARO
Cost30% weightA99HigherA77
Mission25% weightNot scoredB66
Risk15% weightA96HigherF11
Tradability15% weightB55HigherC49
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66A70Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACYQ and MARO are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Option Income⁠

Category · 71 funds
See all 71 ›

ACYQ ranks 2nd and MARO 21st of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AKWINKraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AACYQFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 3AXXVSimplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETFScore 84
  4. Rank 19BGOOYYieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 21BMAROYieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 21BNFLYYieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACYQAFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

MAROBYieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF

In short

ACYQ No data

MARO Income squeezed out of a bitcoin miner that trades like one. Launched in December 2024, MARO sells call spreads on MARA rather than plain covered calls, so the upside it gives away is a band, not everything above one strike.

Stated mandate

ACYQ No data

MARO The fund seeks weekly income by actively selling call spreads on MARA while retaining participation in MARA share-price appreciation.

Why people hold it

ACYQ No data

  • MARO The spread twist: sell one call, own a higher-strike one. The giveaway is limited to the gap between strikes, and the fund keeps participating in MARA above it.
  • A 1.00% expense ratio, a touch under the typical single-stock option income fund and under YieldMax's other MARA vehicle, MAAY, at 1.07%.
  • One of the stronger builds in a crowded single-stock income cohort, and it trades actively, so getting in and out is rarely the hard part.
  • Standard 1940 Act fund wrapper with income as the stated goal: distributions on a regular schedule, a 1099 at tax time, no K-1 paperwork.

Worth knowing

ACYQ No data

  • MARO Everything rides on one bitcoin miner. No diversification, and the fund's measured risk sits at the wild end of its peer group.
  • MARA exposure comes through options, not shares. You hold a fund, not the stock, and the spread narrows the upside cap without removing it.
  • Payouts come from option premiums, which rise and fall with MARA's volatility. The income stream is variable by design.

Full ACYQ profile⁠

Full MARO profile⁠

ACYQ vs MARO Holdings

As of

How ACYQ and MARO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ACYQ and 0.0% of MARO.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for ACYQ and MARO.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for ACYQ.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ACYQ100.0%
  • MARO153.9%

Securities held

  • ACYQ6
  • MARO7

Asset class

ACYQ
Multi-Asset
MARO
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in ACYQ6
  • In both0
  • Only in MARO7

Only in ACYQ

6 securities, 98.4% of ACYQ by weight

  • U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 11/27/202633.26%
  • U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 12/31/202632.26%
  • U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/202631.90%

Only in MARO

7 securities, 100% of MARO by weight

  • United States Treasury Bill 02/18/202753.50%
  • United States Treasury Bill 07/08/202733.49%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/202732.22%

Weight gaps

ACYQ and MARO share no securities.

All 3 ACYQ holdings⁠All MARO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACYQ vs MARO Cost

Overpaying MARO vs ACYQ

$4,206

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACYQ 0.75%

    $14,482

  • MARO 1.00%

    $18,688

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACYQ 0.75%
  • MARO 1.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MARO $18,688ACYQ $14,482

Year by year

YearACYQMAROOverpaying
10$1,336$1,763$427
20$5,078$6,625$1,547
30$14,482$18,688$4,206

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
  • 1.00%MARO
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
  • Median 1.04%

ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds

MARO 20th cheapest of 71 funds

ACYQ vs MARO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
MARO 251.61%
Payout (12M)
ACYQ No data
MARO $5.71
Last payment
ACYQ $0.39
MARO $0.03
Ex-dividend
ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
MARO Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
MARO Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
ACYQ Monthly
MARO Weekly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ACYQMonthly · 2 paymentsAll ACYQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.37; Oct 1, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
MAROWeekly · 44 paymentsAll MARO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 44 payments in 2026 YTD. Jan 2, 2026 $0.13; Jan 8, 2026 $0.13; Jan 15, 2026 $0.12; Jan 22, 2026 $0.14; Jan 29, 2026 $0.13; Feb 5, 2026 $0.10; Feb 12, 2026 $0.09; Feb 19, 2026 $0.09; Feb 26, 2026 $0.10; Mar 5, 2026 $0.10; Mar 12, 2026 $0.10; Mar 19, 2026 $0.12; Mar 26, 2026 $0.09; Apr 2, 2026 $0.08; Apr 9, 2026 $0.11; Apr 16, 2026 $0.11; Apr 23, 2026 $0.14; Apr 30, 2026 $0.14; May 7, 2026 $0.13; May 14, 2026 $0.13; May 21, 2026 $0.12; May 28, 2026 $0.12; Jun 4, 2026 $0.14; Jun 11, 2026 $0.09; Jun 18, 2026 $0.11; Jun 25, 2026 $0.11; Jul 2, 2026 $0.10; Jul 9, 2026 $0.08; Jul 16, 2026 $0.09; Jul 23, 2026 $0.09; Jul 30, 2026 $0.08; Aug 6, 2026 $0.07; Aug 13, 2026 $0.06; Aug 20, 2026 $0.05; Aug 27, 2026 $0.07; Sep 3, 2026 $0.06; Sep 10, 2026 $0.07; Sep 17, 2026 $0.07; Sep 24, 2026 $0.08; Oct 1, 2026 $0.07; Oct 8, 2026 $0.05; Oct 15, 2026 $0.04; Oct 22, 2026 $0.03; Oct 29, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

ACYQ vs MARO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACYQ No dataMARO 55.9%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACYQ No dataMARO −0.86since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACYQ No dataMARO −76.4%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACYQ 1.82MARO 2.43

ACYQ and MARO in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • ACYQAvsKWINA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MAROBvsKWINA

    YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACYQAvsXXVA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MAROBvsXXVA

    YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACYQAvsAAPYA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MAROBvsAAPYA

    YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.