Skip to content

ACYQ vs SCA

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

ACYQANYSE Arca

Graniteshares Autocallable Smci ETF

SCADNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ACYQ −0.43pt a year

ACYQ0.75%SCA1.18%

Avg volume · 30D

ACYQ 27.6×the volume

ACYQ98KSCA3.55K

ACYQ vs SCA Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026

+5.0%ACYQ+24.5%SCA

Aug 7, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026. ACYQ +5.0%. SCA +24.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%15%20%Aug 7Sep 17Oct 28
Expense ratio
ACYQ 0.75%, better
SCA 1.18%
Fund size
ACYQ $102M
SCA $4M
Holdings
ACYQ 7
SCA 1
Avg volume (30D)
ACYQ 98K sh, better
SCA 3.55K sh
NAV per share
ACYQ $20.20
SCA $23.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACYQ as of

ACYQ: Cost 99, Risk 96, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. SCA: Cost 19, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings not scored, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACYQ, SCA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACYQSCA
Cost30% weightA99HigherF19
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA96HigherB65
Tradability15% weightB55HigherD27
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66HigherC41

Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACYQ and SCA are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Option Income⁠

Category · 71 funds
See all 71 ›

ACYQ ranks 2nd and SCA 60th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AKWINKraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AACYQFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 3AXXVSimplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETFScore 82
  4. Rank 59DAZYYGraniteShares YieldBOOST AMZN ETFScore 34
  5. Rank 60DSCAGraniteshares Autocallable Smci ETFScore 33
  6. Rank 61DCWYGraniteShares YieldBOOST CRWV ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACYQAFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

SCADGraniteshares Autocallable Smci ETF

In short

ACYQ No data

SCA Autocallables have mostly lived inside bank-issued structured notes. SCA puts that payoff on Super Micro Computer in an ETF wrapper: a laddered book of contracts with coupon barriers, early-call triggers and limited downside protection, priced and traded daily.

Stated mandate

ACYQ No data

SCA The Fund seeks to generate income through a portfolio of autocallable instruments linked to Super Micro Computer, Inc., with limited downside protection.

Why people hold it

ACYQ No data

  • SCA Autocallable income used to arrive as a bank-issued note. GraniteShares brought the structure to US-listed ETFs in 2026, with daily pricing and exchange trading.graniteshares.comgraniteshares.com 2
  • Holds a ladder of autocallables on one stock at staggered barriers and observation dates, so one bad observation doesn't switch off the entire coupon stream.graniteshares.comgraniteshares.com 2
  • Fee of 1.07% sits right at the middle of its single-stock options-income peer group, and the fund handles barrier monitoring, rolling and reinvestment internally.graniteshares.com
  • Targets monthly distributions, with a maturity barrier that defines a band of downside protection before stock losses pass through.graniteshares.com

Worth knowing

ACYQ No data

  • SCA Coupons are contingent, not fixed: if the stock sits below the coupon barrier on an observation date, no coupon is paid for that period.graniteshares.com
  • Below the maturity barrier, the stock's full downside passes through, while early calls end future coupons. Income first, not equity upside.graniteshares.com
  • Launched in 2026 and thinly traded since, so short history and bid-ask spreads matter. The covered-call route on the same stock (SMCY) charges 1.01%.

Full ACYQ profile⁠

Full SCA profile⁠

ACYQ vs SCA Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACYQ vs SCA Cost

Overpaying SCA vs ACYQ

$7,061

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACYQ 0.75%

    $14,482

  • SCA 1.18%

    $21,543

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACYQ 0.75%
  • SCA 1.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530SCA $21,543ACYQ $14,482

Year by year

YearACYQSCAOverpaying
10$1,336$2,065$729
20$5,078$7,697$2,619
30$14,482$21,543$7,061

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
  • 1.18%SCA
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
  • Median 1.04%

ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds

SCA 48th cheapest of 71 funds

ACYQ vs SCA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Last payment
ACYQ $0.39
SCA $0.78
Ex-dividend
ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
SCA Oct 7, 2026
Paid on
ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
SCA Oct 9, 2026
Frequency
ACYQ Monthly
SCA Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ACYQMonthly · 2 paymentsAll ACYQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.37; Oct 1, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
SCAMonthly · 5 paymentsAll SCA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments in 2026 YTD. Jun 3, 2026 $0.80; Jul 1, 2026 $0.83; Aug 12, 2026 $0.81; Sep 9, 2026 $0.79; Oct 7, 2026 $0.78. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

ACYQ vs SCA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACYQ 1.82SCA 1.57

ACYQ and SCA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ACYQAvsKWINA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCADvsKWINA

    Graniteshares Autocallable Smci ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.18% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACYQAvsXXVA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCADvsXXVA

    Graniteshares Autocallable Smci ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.18% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACYQAvsAAPYA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCADvsAAPYA

    Graniteshares Autocallable Smci ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.18% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.