AAPY ranks 4th and SCA 60th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
AAPY vs SCA
AAPY −0.19pt a year
0.99%1.18%
AAPY 1.7×the volume
5.9K3.55K
AAPY vs SCA Performance
+13.0%+13.9%
- AAPY 0.99%, better
- SCA 1.18%
- AAPY $8M
- SCA $4M
- AAPY +31.9%
- SCA
- AAPY 10.54%
- SCA
- AAPY 7
- SCA 1
- AAPY 5.9K sh, better
- SCA 3.55K sh
- AAPY $28.20
- SCA $23.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPY | SCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77Higher | F19 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A80Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | D36 | |
| Durability | B55Higher | C41 |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. AAPY and SCA are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPYA
SCAD
In short
AAPY Apple income without slamming the brakes on upside: AAPY builds its Apple exposure with options, sells calls above the market rather than at it, and pays monthly. Fee is 0.99% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.15% gross).
SCA Autocallables have mostly lived inside bank-issued structured notes. SCA puts that payoff on Super Micro Computer in an ETF wrapper: a laddered book of contracts with coupon barriers, early-call triggers and limited downside protection, priced and traded daily.
Stated mandate
AAPY The Fund seeks current income while providing exposure to Apple Inc.'s share price, with potential gains limited by its options strategy.
SCA The Fund seeks to generate income through a portfolio of autocallable instruments linked to Super Micro Computer, Inc., with limited downside protection.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPY vs SCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPY vs SCA Cost
Overpaying SCA vs AAPY
$3,018
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPY 0.99%
$18,525
SCA 1.18%
$21,543
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPY | SCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $2,065 | $319 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $7,697 | $1,132 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $21,543 | $3,018 |
- 0.99%AAPY, cheaper
- 1.18%SCA
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
AAPY 9th cheapest of 71 funds
SCA 48th cheapest of 71 funds
AAPY vs SCA Dividends
- AAPY 10.54%
- SCA
- AAPY $3.05
- SCA
- AAPY $0.25
- SCA $0.78
- AAPY Oct 21, 2026
- SCA Oct 7, 2026
- AAPY Oct 22, 2026
- SCA Oct 9, 2026
- AAPY Monthly
- SCA Monthly
Distribution history
AAPY vs SCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPY 18.4%SCA
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPY 0.84SCA
- Worst fall
- AAPY −29.2%SCA
- Market sensitivity
- AAPY 0.75SCA 1.57
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.